Comparing muscle response monitoring using median and ulnar nerves during surgery
Official title: Median Versus Ulnar Nerve Quantitative Electromyography Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring Comparison
Run by Loma Linda University · NCT06553131 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if monitoring muscle responses from the median nerve during surgery is just as good as using the ulnar nerve for people under general anesthesia.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 32 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Loma Linda University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Loma Linda, California) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 26, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06553131 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 75 scheduled for elective surgeries requiring muscle relaxation under general anesthesia.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications to rocuronium, neuromuscular diseases, or significant upper extremity issues may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study aims to compare the muscle response to neuromuscular blockade at two different nerve sites in the arm: the ulnar nerve and the median nerve. Electromyography will be used to measure the depth of muscle relaxation during elective surgeries requiring general anesthesia. Participants will have electrodes placed on both arms to stimulate the ulnar nerve on one side and the median nerve on the other, allowing for a direct comparison of their responses. The study will help determine if the median nerve can provide comparable information to the ulnar nerve regarding neuromuscular transmission.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve monitoring techniques for neuromuscular blockade, leading to better patient outcomes during surgery.
How similar studies have gone: While the ulnar nerve is the standard for monitoring, this approach using the median nerve is novel and has not been extensively tested in prior studies.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults 18 - 75 years of age who are able to provide consent * Scheduled for elective surgery requiring muscle relaxation, in a supine position under general anesthesia, with an anticipated duration of at least 1.5 hours Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindication to rocuronium use * Comorbidities that may prolong the duration of neuromuscular blockade or alter pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics, such as: * Neuromuscular disease * Expected or known difficult airway * Rocuronium allergy * BMI \< 18.5 or \> 40 * History of adhesive allergy * Upper extremity weakness, limb deformity, or absence of all or part of an upper limb * Patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass
Where it's running
-
Loma Linda University Troesch Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Michael Benggon, MD — Loma Linda University
- Study coordinator: Melissa D McCabe, MD, MSCR
- Email: mmccabe@llu.edu
- Phone: 909 558 4475
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
NMTCuff vs standard TOF monitoring during gynecologic oncology surgery
This study tests whether NMTCuff monitoring can better detect neuromuscular recovery than standard TOF monitoring in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic cancer surgery.
-
HRS-9190 vs Rocuronium for Muscle Relaxation During Anesthesia
This Phase 3 trial tests whether HRS-9190 can provide effective muscle relaxation for intubation and surgery as compared with rocuronium in adults undergoing elective general anesthesia.
-
Two EMG Monitors for Deep NMB During Robotic/Thoracic Surgery
This study tests whether two quantitative EMG monitors (TetraGraph and TwitchView) can better maintain deep neuromuscular blockade during abdominal and thoracic surgery by comparing diaphragmatic movements and breath-initiation events in the same patient.
-
Low-Dose Rocuronium Maintenance During Spine Surgery With Intraoperative Monitoring
This study tests whether keeping a low, controlled amount of rocuronium during spine surgery helps nerve monitoring while improving the surgical field compared to stopping rocuronium after induction.
-
Safer muscle relaxant and reversal choice during anesthesia for people with chronic kidney disease
This trial will try to see if using cisatracurium with neostigmine leads to fewer breathing problems after surgery than using rocuronium with sugammadex in adults who have chronic kidney disease.
-
Comparing muscle responses for monitoring neuromuscular function after surgery
This study is testing a device to see if it can better monitor muscle function after surgery for patients who have received a specific muscle relaxant.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.