Comparing mesh removal to no mesh removal for chronic groin pain after hernia repair
Official title: Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by The Cleveland Clinic · NCT05484635 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether taking out hernia mesh helps people with chronic groin pain feel better compared to not removing the mesh after their hernia repair.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 70 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The Cleveland Clinic Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cleveland, Ohio) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 25, 2022 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 6, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05484635 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old with chronic nociceptive groin pain lasting more than six months after inguinal hernia repair.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who do not exhibit characteristics of nociceptive groin pain or have mild pain may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the management of chronic groin pain following minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, specifically assessing the effects of hernia mesh removal versus no removal. It is a double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial where participants may undergo diagnostic laparoscopy and could potentially have their mesh removed if they do not achieve adequate pain relief. Patients will be informed about the trial and can withdraw at any time. The study aims to determine if mesh removal leads to significant pain relief in patients suffering from chronic pain lasting more than six months.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide effective pain relief options for patients suffering from chronic groin pain after hernia repair.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored similar interventions, but the specific approach of mesh removal for chronic pain in this context is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * \> 18 years of age * CPIP lasting \> 6 months after laparoscopic or robotic inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh * Must exhibit 1 or more of the following characteristics of nociceptive pain: History: * Pain while sitting in a chair for prolonged periods of time with relief when extending the hip or lying supine to straighten the leg * Severe pain when crossing the affected leg over the contralateral leg * "Foreign body sensation" or "tightness" in the groin Exam: -Diffuse tenderness with deep palpation along the inguinal ligament (over the mesh) Somatosensory mapping: * Does not have a maximum trigger point for pain * Lacks characteristics of neuropathic pain (sharp, burning, shooting, paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, etc.) * Moderate to severe pain \[4-10\] when moving from supine to standing on NRS Exclusion Criteria: * No characteristics of nociceptive groin pain * Zero or mild pain \[0-3\] when moving from supine to standing on NRS * Recurrent inguinal hernia detected on clinical exam * Large, femoral, direct or indirect inguinal hernia (F2-3, M2-3, L2-3) on diagnostic laparoscopy as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) classification * Prior open (anterior) approach to inguinal hernia repair (i.e. Lichtenstein) * Prior mesh plugs or Prolene Hernia Systems * History of prostatectomy or vascular procedures in the pelvis or groin
Where it's running
-
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: David Krpata, MD — The Cleveland Clinic
- Study coordinator: David Krpata, MD
- Email: krpatad@ccf.org
- Phone: 216-445-9989
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pneumoperitoneum time and bicarbonate changes during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
This study will see if longer pneumoperitoneum time during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair causes changes in blood bicarbonate levels in adults.
-
Quadro-iliac plane block versus TAP block for pain after inguinal hernia surgery
In adults undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair, this study tests whether the Quadro-iliac Plane Block provides better postoperative pain relief than the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block.
-
Robotically repairing ventral or inguinal hernias using OviTex mesh
This study is testing whether using a special mesh called OviTex in robotic surgery can help people with ventral or inguinal hernias recover better and avoid complications.
-
Two laparoscopic techniques for repairing inguinal hernias in children
This study tests whether LPEC or LIS works better for repairing inguinal hernias in children aged 1 to 15 who need laparoscopic repair.
-
Shouldice groin hernia repair: permanent vs slowly dissolving stitches
We’re testing whether slowly dissolving stitches (PDS) work as well as permanent stitches (Prolene) for adults with a non-mesh Shouldice inguinal hernia repair.
-
Acupressure for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic TEP Hernia Repair
This trial tests whether true acupressure, given after surgery, reduces pain more than sham acupressure or standard care for adults undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.