Comparing mandibular advancement devices and hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea
Official title: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Non-PAP Outcomes and Viable Alternatives (OSANOVA): Comparison of Mandibular Advancement Device and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes
Run by Washington University School of Medicine · NCT07074288 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether mandibular advancement devices or hypoglossal nerve stimulation work better for adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea who can't use or won't tolerate CPAP.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Washington University School of Medicine Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (St Louis, Missouri) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | March 2027 |
| Study ends | May 2027 |
| Registry record updated | April 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07074288 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥15) who have declined, failed, or are intolerant of PAP, have BMI ≤40 kg/m², predominantly obstructive apneas (<25% central/mixed), can attend the Washington University site, and are planning to receive MAD or HGNS are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with mild OSA, predominantly central sleep apnea, BMI >40 kg/m², those comfortable using PAP, or those unwilling/unable to undergo the required interventions or follow-up visits are unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
OSANOVA follows two non-randomized cohorts of adults with moderate-to-severe OSA who have declined, failed, or are intolerant of positive airway pressure therapy: one cohort receiving mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy and one receiving hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS). Researchers will collect baseline and post-intervention patient-reported outcome measures and standard sleep study parameters, with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, daytime sleepiness (ESS), snoring-related symptoms (SNORE-25), patient satisfaction, clinician-rated global improvement, and treatment re-selection rates. The goal is to directly compare real-world outcomes to inform treatment choice.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help patients and clinicians choose the non‑PAP treatment that most improves sleep quality and daily symptoms.
How similar studies have gone: Both MAD and HGNS have demonstrated benefit for obstructive sleep apnea in prior studies, but direct head-to-head comparisons in PAP‑failing patients are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Must consent to being a part of the study * Must be willing and able to physically present to the our office site on the Hospital campus whenever necessary over the course of the study * Able to read, write, speak, and understand English * Willing to complete study surveys over the course of the study. * Must have a diagnosis for moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥15) with indications for PAP therapy OSA is stratified into mild (5 ≤ AHI ≤ 15), moderate (15 \< AHI ≤ 30), and severe (AHI\>30) * Must have declined PAP therapy (unwillingness to use), failed PAP therapy (AHI \> 15 on PAP), or are inadherent to PAP therapy (not using PAP ≥4 hours/night for ≥5 nights per week, also defined as intolerance to PAP) * Age ≥ 18 years * BMI ≤ 40 kg/m² * Central/Mixed apneas contribute \< 25% of AHI (Predominantly Obstructive Sleep Apnea) * Willing to complete pre-intervention and post-intervention sleep studies * Planning to obtain MAD or HGNS as part of clinical care Exclusion Criteria: * AHI \> 65 o The guidelines for HGNS usage were originally approved for an AHI upper limit of 65. We will not enroll anyone in the study with an AHI greater than 65. * Dental conditions such as temporomandibular joint disease, periodontal disease, dental disease, insufficient dentition (edentulism) to support appliance retention, and inadequate range of motion of the jaw. Similarly, patients undergoing dental realignment (e.g., braces or retaining device) are not suitable candidates. * Chronic nasal obstruction * Individuals without manual dexterity to place and remove the device such as those afflicted with severe arthritis, or neuromuscular disease that affects dexterity. * Prior intolerance to MAD * Rapid therapy required: patients in whom rapid initiation of treatment is desirable (e.g., patients with severe symptomatic OSA, sleepiness while driving) and they declined PAP without PAP failure. PAP therapy can be initiated quickly while MAD initiation requires incremental titration of the device over weeks to months to attain optimal efficacy. * Severe or prolonged Oxygen desaturation: patients with severe oxyhemoglobin desaturation during sleep (e.g., nadir peripheral oxygen saturation \[SpO2\] \<70 percent), caution is warranted as oral appliance therapy may not provide optimal improvement in oxygenation. * Alcohol or illicit substance use at least daily * Unstable psychiatric condition * Current use of a GLP-1 receptor agonist (e.g., Zepbound, Wegovy, Ozempic, Mounjaro) with ongoing, active weight loss at the time of enrollment, or recent dose escalation within the prior 8 weeks.
Where it's running
-
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jay F Piccirillo, MD — Washington University School of Medicine
- Study coordinator: Sara Kukuljan
- Email: kukuljas@wustl.edu
- Phone: 314-362-7563
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Multimodal Deep Learning to Predict Sleep Apnea Severity from SpO2 and Ballistocardiography
Researchers are testing a smart-mattress-based method that uses SpO2 and ballistocardiography data to predict sleep apnea severity in adults undergoing overnight sleep study.
-
Nightly wearable monitoring with at-home submental electrical stimulation for sleep apnea
This pilot test checks whether wearing a ring sensor at night and doing a 4-week at-home submental electrical stimulation is feasible for adults with obstructive sleep apnea and looks at changes in sleep metrics.
-
Functional capacity and muscle function in adults with obstructive sleep apnea
This study tests how obstructive sleep apnea affects respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, endurance, and upper‑extremity function compared with healthy adults.
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
This study tests whether applying gentle electrical stimulation to the throat muscles at night can reduce sleep apnea severity in adults with obstructive sleep apnea.
-
Physical activity habits and sleep/ breathing in obstructive sleep apnea
This study tests whether daily physical activity habits affect sleep quality and breathing measurements in people with obstructive sleep apnea who are on CPAP therapy.
-
CES-EES score and a wearable ring for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea
This study tests whether the CES-EES clinical score and the Belun Ring wearable can accurately diagnose obstructive sleep apnea without in-lab polysomnography in adults referred for suspected OSA.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.