Comparing Maitland rotation mobilization versus Mulligan spinal mobilization with leg movement for lumbar radiculopathy
Official title: Comparative Effects of Maitland's Rotation Mobilization and Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Lumbar Radiculopathy
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07050966 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares Maitland rotation mobilization and Mulligan spinal mobilization with leg movement to see which reduces pain and improves motion for adults with chronic lumbar radiculopathy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 15, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | July 3, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07050966 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–65 with chronic (≥3 months) unilateral lumbar radiculopathy, an NPRS pain score between 5 and 7, who are ambulant and can attend in-person treatments at the study site.
✕Probably not a fit
People with other spine conditions (failed back surgery, spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis), non-ambulant patients, those on anticoagulants, or pregnant women are excluded and unlikely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial assigns adults with chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy to one of two treatment groups: Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement plus lower limb neurodynamic mobilization, or Maitland's lumbar rotation mobilization plus the same neurodynamic technique. Treatments are delivered in clinic at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy and outcomes are measured for pain, lumbar range of motion, and functional mobility. Eligible participants are ambulant adults aged 18–65 with symptoms for at least 3 months and an NPRS pain score between 5 and 7. The study compares short- and longer-term changes to identify which mobilization approach provides more durable benefit.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose a manual therapy approach that gives more sustained pain relief and improved mobility for people with lumbar radiculopathy.
How similar studies have gone: Both Maitland and Mulligan mobilization techniques have shown short-term symptom improvements in prior studies, but direct head-to-head comparisons for lasting effects in lumbar radiculopathy are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age: 18-65 years * Both Males and Females * Participants with a diagnosis of chronic (≥3 months) lumbar unilateral radiculopathy referred from Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi * NPRS score of \> 5 and \< 8 Exclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of other back conditions (e.g. failed back surgery syndrome, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis, non-specific low back pain, and fracture) * Non ambulant/wheelchair-bound or having cauda equina syndrome * Patient taking anticoagulants * Pregnant Females
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Maryam Razzaq, DPT
- Email: maryamrazzaq118@gmail.com
- Phone: +923095278823
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Mulligan leg raise vs spinal mobilization with leg movement for lumbar radiculopathy
This trial tests whether Mulligan leg raise traction or spinal mobilization with leg movement helps people with lumbar radiculopathy feel better.
-
TECAR therapy added to physical therapy for chronic discogenic sciatica
This study tests whether adding TECAR therapy to a standard physical therapy program helps reduce pain and improve function in adults with chronic discogenic sciatica.
-
Pharmacopuncture vs. physical therapy for chronic lumbar radiculopathy
This pragmatic trial tests whether pharmacopuncture can help people with chronic lumbar radiculopathy as well as or better than physical therapy.
-
Femoral Stretch Test in L2-L4 Lumbar Radiculopathy
This study tests how well the femoral stretch test detects nerve root compression in people with L2-L4 radiculopathy who are having a targeted epidural injection as part of their care.
-
Trans-spinal Electromagnetic Neuromodulation added to physical therapy for discogenic L5-S1 radiculopathy
This study tests whether adding trans-spinal electromagnetic neuromodulation to standard physical therapy helps people with unilateral disc-related lower back nerve pain.
-
Effect of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise vs. Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement for Lumbar Radiculopathy
A small study tests two manual therapy techniques to see which better eases leg pain and improves function in adults with lumbar radiculopathy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.