Comparing Lignocaine and Bupivacaine for Pain Relief After Vaginal Delivery with Episiotomy

Lignocaine vs Bupivacaine Infiltration for Postpartum Perineal Pain After Vaginal Delivery With Episiotomy in Primigravidae: A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial

Not applicable Interventional Ain Shams University · NCT06568289

This study is testing whether lignocaine or bupivacaine works better for relieving pain after vaginal delivery with an episiotomy in first-time mothers.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment60 (estimated)
Ages18 Years to 40 Years
SexFemale
SponsorAin Shams University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Cairo)
Trial IDNCT06568289 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This study compares the effectiveness and safety of lignocaine versus bupivacaine infiltration for managing postpartum perineal pain in first-time mothers who undergo vaginal delivery with episiotomy. Episiotomy, while beneficial for childbirth, can lead to significant pain and complications. Bupivacaine is a long-acting anesthetic preferred for its selective effect on sensory nerves, while lignocaine is a rapid-onset anesthetic with a shorter duration. The trial aims to determine which anesthetic provides better pain relief and safety for patients.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are first-time mothers (primigravidae) who are undergoing vaginal delivery with episiotomy.

Not a fit: Patients with a history of drug allergies to the study medications or those receiving epidural or spinal anesthesia will not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved pain management strategies for postpartum women, enhancing their recovery and quality of life.

How similar studies have performed: Previous studies have shown varying success with local anesthetics for postpartum pain management, but this specific comparison of lignocaine and bupivacaine is novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Primigravidae with the full term undergoing vaginal delivery with episiotomy.
* Pregnancies and singleton vertex cephalic fetuses.
* In the active phase of the first stage of labor.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with history of drug allergies to study drugs as this will increase the risk of complications.
* Patients undergoing vaginal delivery under epidural or spinal anesthesia as they will affect post-operative pain and interfere with assessment of efficacy of local infiltration of the study drugs.
* Evidence of local infection at site of injection as this will interfere with the action of the study drug and will increase the risk of complications.
* Inability to cooperate as this will affect our assessment.
* Patient's refusal.
* Any intraoperative complications that will affect our outcome criteria (bleeding, organ injury) as they will affect patient's vital data and affect our assessment.
* Neurological comorbidities (chronic pain disorder, chronic systemic disease, neurological disorder, neuropathic pain) as they will need more analgesia.
* Drug abuse as they will be tolerant to the used analgesics.

Where this trial is running

Cairo

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions LignocaineBupivacainePostpartum Perineal PainVaginal DeliveryEpisiotomyPrimigravidae
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.