Comparing laser and electrocoagulation treatments for genital warts

Carbon Dioxide Laser Ablation Versus Electrocoagulation - a Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Two Surgical Treatments in Women Undergoing Therapy for Condyloma Acuminata

Not applicable Interventional Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry · NCT02520986

This study is testing whether laser treatment or electrocoagulation is better for treating genital warts in women by looking at how well each method works and how patients feel about the results.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment114 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexFemale
SponsorZydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune Cytochemistry Academic / other
Locations1 site (Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia)
Trial IDNCT02520986 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This clinical trial compares two surgical methods for treating condyloma acuminata in women: carbon dioxide laser ablation and electrocoagulation. A total of 114 participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatments. The primary outcome will assess cosmetic results six weeks post-treatment using a visual analogue scale, while secondary outcomes will evaluate intervention time, complications, satisfaction, postoperative pain, and recurrence rates of genital warts.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates for this study are women diagnosed with condyloma acuminata who can provide informed consent.

Not a fit: Patients who are pregnant, have significant language barriers, or have certain medical conditions such as HIV or malignancies may not benefit from this study.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into the most effective treatment method for genital warts, improving patient outcomes and satisfaction.

How similar studies have performed: Previous studies have explored various treatment methods for condyloma acuminata, but this specific comparison of laser versus electrocoagulation is relatively novel.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* informed consent
* women with anogenital affection of condyloma acuminata

Exclusion Criteria:

* significant language barrier
* pregnancy
* unwillingness to participate
* the use of blood thinner or known coagulation disorder
* the use of immunosuppressive medicament
* HIV-Infection
* malignant diseases
* local therapy within 8 weeks before Treatment
* wound healing disorder

Where this trial is running

Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Condylomata AcuminataSexually transmitted diseaseGenital WartsVenereal Warts
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.