Clinical trial Recruiting at 6 sites Phase 3 Interventional Ages 18 to 99

Comparing Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting to Prevent Post ERCP Pancreatitis

Official title: Comparative Effectiveness Between Rectally Administered Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-panceaticography (ERCP) Pancreatitis: a Randomized Trial

Run by Chinese University of Hong Kong · NCT03713879 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether giving indomethacin through the rectum or using pancreatic stenting is better at preventing pancreatitis after a procedure called ERCP in patients who are at high risk for this complication.

More Post-ERCP Pancreatitis trials

Quick facts

PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 99 Years
SexAll
Enrollment1734 (estimated)
SponsorChinese University of Hong Kong
Academic / other
Locations7 sites (Xi'an, Shaanxi and 6 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 21, 2019
Main results expectedMay 31, 2028
Study endsDecember 31, 2028
Registry record updatedOctober 21, 2026
Trial IDNCT03713879 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are patients with specific risk factors for post ERCP pancreatitis, such as sphincter of Oddi dysfunction or a history of pancreatitis.

Probably not a fit

Patients who may not benefit from this study include those with contraindications to NSAIDs, such as active gastrointestinal bleeding or renal failure, and those intended for pancreatic stenting due to strictures.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of rectally administered indomethacin versus pancreatic duct stenting in preventing post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients. PEP is a common complication following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and both interventions have shown independent benefits in reducing its incidence. The study will be conducted as a multi-centre randomized controlled trial, enrolling patients with specific risk factors for PEP. By directly comparing these two methods, the trial seeks to determine if one approach is superior or if both are equally effective.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide clearer guidance on the most effective method to prevent post ERCP pancreatitis, potentially reducing complications and improving patient outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with both interventions independently, but this is the first direct comparison between rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct stenting.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

presence of one of the following risk factors for Post ERCP Pancreatitis

1. sphincter of Oddi dysfunction
2. history of PEP, pancreatic instrumentation or sphincterotomy, precut sphincterotomy,
3. difficult cannulation defined by \>5 cannulation attempts
4. the use of double wire technique in bile duct access
5. at least 2 of the followings including i) female age\<50 ii) 3 pancreatograms iii) acinarization (contrast injection to tail fo pancreas). iv) normal bilirubin; v)guidewire to the tail of pancreas or secondary branches.

Exclusion Criteria:

* patients intended for pancreatic stenting e.g. those with pancreatic duct strictures, ampullectomy,
* without informed consents from patient or next of kin
* age \<18
* pregnant or lactating women
* patients with altered anatomy except except Billroth I and II gastrectomy
* contraindications to the use of NSAIDs such as those with active gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure (serum creatinine \> 140)
* known NSAID allergy
* incipient heart failure.

Where it's running

  • Endoscopy centre
    Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
    Recruiting
  • Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital,Endoscopy centre
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
    Recruiting
  • Endoscopy centre
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
    Recruiting
  • Endoscopy centre
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
    Recruiting
  • Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • 2. Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Recruiting
Show 1 more location
  • Endoscopy centre
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.