Comparing humidification methods for patients on mechanical ventilation
Evaluation of Gas Humidification Practices in Patients Under Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Benefit of the F & P950 Heated Humidifier: Comparison With the MR 850 on Clinical Events of Under-humidification
This study is testing which of two heated humidifiers works better for patients on mechanical ventilation in the ICU to help prevent breathing problems.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Sponsor | Laval University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Québec, Quebec) |
| Trial ID | NCT06719258 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
What this trial studies
This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of two different heated humidifiers used in intensive care units for patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. It aims to compare the MR850 and FP950 humidification methods to determine which is more efficient in preventing respiratory complications. Data will be collected retrospectively from patients admitted to the ICU since June 1, 2021, who meet specific inclusion criteria. The study focuses on understanding how different humidification practices impact patient outcomes related to respiratory secretions and overall lung health.
Who should consider this trial
Good fit: Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 and older who are admitted to intensive care and require prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation.
Not a fit: Patients who are on mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours or are enrolled in a specific concurrent study may not benefit from this research.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved management of respiratory complications in mechanically ventilated patients.
How similar studies have performed: While this study compares established humidification methods, similar studies have shown varying results regarding the effectiveness of different humidification practices in critical care settings.
Eligibility criteria
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * ≥ 18 years old * Admitted to intensive care * Under invasive mechanical ventilation with the usual indications for the use of a heated humidifier (prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and / or protective ventilation requiring high respiratory rates. Exclusion Criteria: * Mechanical venitilation immediately after surgery (\<24h) * Imminent extubation or planned intubation of very short duration (\<24h) * Enrolled in the SAVE-ICU study in the group receiving volatile agents with the AnaConDa system.
Where this trial is running
Québec, Quebec
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec — Québec, Quebec, Canada (Recruiting)
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: François Lellouche
- Email: francois.lellouche@criucpq.ulaval.ca
- Phone: 418-656-8711
How to participate
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
- Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.