Comparing high and low-frequency high-intensity training for stroke recovery
Official title: High vs Low-frequency of High-intensity Training in Chronic Stroke
Run by Indiana University · NCT06612723 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether more frequent high-intensity walking training helps people who have had a stroke recover their walking ability better than less frequent training.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Indiana University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Indianapolis, Indiana) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 16, 2024 |
| Main results expected | October 2026 |
| Study ends | October 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06612723 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-85 who have experienced a unilateral stroke more than 6 months prior and can ambulate with some assistance.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with uncontrolled cardiopulmonary or metabolic diseases, or those with significant neurological impairments may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This pilot study aims to explore how the frequency of high-intensity gait training affects locomotor outcomes in individuals who have experienced a stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a high-frequency training group, receiving 18 sessions over 6 weeks, or a low-frequency group, receiving the same training over 12 weeks. The study will assess outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 weeks post-training to determine the effectiveness of each approach. The focus is on improving gait and overall community mobility through structured rehabilitation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could enhance rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors, leading to improved mobility and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: While similar studies have explored high-intensity training for stroke rehabilitation, this specific comparison of training frequency is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Unilateral deficits following stroke \> 6 months prior; however individuals \> 4 months post-stroke are eligible for consenting, but final eligibility and potential enrollment will not occur until \> 6 months * Age 18-85 * Weight \< 350 pounds * Able to follow 3-step commands * Able to ambulate with self-selected gait speeds between 0.10-1.0 m/s without physical assistance, but with below knee bracing and/or assistive device as needed * Lower extremity Fugl-Meyer \< 34 * Medical clearance to participate Exclusion Criteria: * Evidence of cerebellar ataxia * Uncontrolled cardiopulmonary or metabolic disease that limits exercise participation, active heterotopic ossification, recurrent history of lower extremity fractures, previous orthopedic or other peripheral or central neurologic injury that may impair locomotor activities such that, in the judgement of the PI, could compromise the safety of the participant, limit the ability to complete the study, or compromise the objectives of the study. * Currently participating in other physical therapy * \>50 units of Botox in the lower extremity OR in the lower extremity, but above the knee if the participant wears an ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) within the past three months
Where it's running
-
Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Thomas G Hornby, PhD — Indiana University
- Study coordinator: Christopher Henderson, PhD
- Email: henderce@iu.edu
- Phone: 317-329-2353
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
-
Dual-task balance training plus computer-based cognitive training after stroke
In adults who recently had a stroke, the study tests whether adding computerized cognitive exercises to balance training improves balance and other recovery outcomes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.