Comparing guideline-recommended and routine blood pressure checks in women of reproductive age
Official title: Standard vs. Routine Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnancy: Effects of Position and Diurnal Variation
Run by Hillel Yaffe Medical Center · NCT07320339 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether following guideline-recommended steps for taking blood pressure gives different readings than the routine nursing method in women aged 18–40, with and without high blood pressure.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 500 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hillel Yaffe Medical Center Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Hadera, Israel) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 24, 2025 |
| Main results expected | August 24, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 24, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07320339 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal participants are women aged 18–40 who can give informed consent and cooperate with seated, guideline-based and routine blood pressure measurements, whether or not they have hypertension.
✕Probably not a fit
People unlikely to benefit include women who cannot cooperate with the required measurement conditions, those with complex vascular disease that would bias readings, and individuals outside the 18–40 age range.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Accurate blood pressure measurement affects diagnosis and management of hypertension, and guideline groups recommend specific steps such as correct cuff size, five minutes rest, a supported seated position, feet flat, and the arm supported at heart level. This interventional study will obtain blood pressure readings using an 'optimal' protocol that follows these guidelines and a 'common' protocol used in routine nursing practice and compare the results. Participants are women aged 18–40, including those with and without hypertension, recruited at a single center. The primary comparison is the variation in measured blood pressure between the two measurement approaches.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could lead to simpler changes in clinic practice that produce more accurate blood pressure readings and better hypertension detection and management in reproductive-age women.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research and guideline reviews have shown that following recommended measurement procedures can change blood pressure readings compared with common practice, so this study builds on established findings.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Women aged 18-40 * Informed consent to participate. Exclusion Criteria: * Inability to cooperate with BP measurement under optimal conditions * Women with complex underlying disease that may bias the data (e.g. significant vasculopathy)
Where it's running
-
Hille Yaffe Medical Center
Hadera, Israel, Israel Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ikhlas IM Ammash, M.D
- Email: AnnaTu@hymc.gov.il
- Phone: +972-4-7744602
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Breathing for Two: Can inspiratory muscle training help with blood pressure in late pregnancy?
This study tests whether a home-based inspiratory muscle strength training program can safely lower blood pressure in pregnant people in their third trimester.
-
Arm versus ankle mean arterial pressure during elective cesarean delivery
This study will see if a blood pressure cuff on the ankle gives similar mean arterial pressure readings to a standard arm cuff in pregnant people having a planned C-section under spinal anesthesia.
-
How arm position changes blood pressure readings during pregnancy
We will see if different arm positions (supported at heart level, on the lap, or unsupported at the side) change blood pressure readings in pregnant women attending a high-risk clinic.
-
Inflation-based non-invasive blood pressure test compared with standard cuff method
This study tests whether the Philips iNIBP device gives BP readings that match the usual auscultatory cuff method in people aged 3 to 85.
-
Automated Non-Invasive Blood Pressure: Tracking Blood Pressure Changes Using SpO2 Data
This study tests an algorithm that estimates blood pressure changes using data from an SpO2 sensor in patients in the OR, PACU, or ICU who already have invasive BP measured as part of standard care.
-
Blood Pressure from Face Video (Vitacam)
A contactless vitals tool called Vitacam tests if video-based blood pressure readings from the face can match standard cuff measurements in adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.