Comparing full pulpotomy and root canal treatment for irreversible pulpitis
Official title: Full Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Treatment for Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Clinical Study
Run by University of Malaya · NCT06002698 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing whether a less invasive tooth treatment called full pulpotomy works better than traditional root canal treatment for adults with painful tooth issues.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 12 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Malaya Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Kuala Lumpur) |
| Trial ID | NCT06002698 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 12 years or older with a mature posterior tooth showing signs of irreversible pulpitis and capable of being treated with either pulpotomy or root canal therapy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with active periodontal disease, apical periodontitis, or complex medical histories that may affect treatment outcomes are unlikely to benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of full pulpotomy versus traditional root canal treatment in adults with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in their posterior teeth. It will involve a randomized controlled design to assess outcomes related to pain relief and tooth preservation. Additionally, the study will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pulpotomy and gather feedback from both dentists and patients regarding the acceptability of the treatment options. The trial seeks to provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice in endodontics.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved treatment options for patients suffering from irreversible pulpitis, potentially preserving more teeth and reducing the need for more invasive procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have suggested the potential benefits of vital pulp treatment approaches, but this specific comparison of full pulpotomy and root canal treatment is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 12 years or older (with a mature permanent tooth demonstrating radiographic evidence of a deep caries/restorations and signs/ symptoms indicative of IRP (moderate to severe spontaneous lingering pain). Tooth will be responsive to cold and EPT sensibility testing, restorable and can be adequately isolated during treatment. One posterior tooth (molar or premolar) only per patient. Exclusion Criteria: * Teeth with active periodontal disease (pocket depth \>5mm); teeth indicated for elective root canal treatment for restorative purposes, teeth with apical periodontitis, patients with complex medical histories that may affect their caries experience and healing ability (immunocompromised, radiotherapy), patients who are unable to consent; history of previous trauma to the tooth, presence of apical radiolucency and patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding. Intraoperatively, any evidence of purulence or excessive bleeding that cannot be controlled with a cotton pellet with 2-4% hypochlorite for 10 minutes will be excluded.
Where it's running
-
Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hany Ahmed, PhD — University of Malaya
- Study coordinator: Hany Ahmed, PhD
- Email: hanyendodontist@um.edu.my
- Phone: 0060129857937
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
E-IodoCal paste vs ZOE in primary molar pulpectomies
This randomized split-mouth trial tests whether E-IodoCal paste works as well as ZOE paste for filling root canals in primary molars of children aged 4 to 8.
-
Comparison of two ways to numb a child's jaw during a root canal in the back teeth
This study tests whether digital anesthesia works as well as the traditional nerve block for numbing kids' lower back teeth during emergency root canals.
-
Pulpotomy versus root canal for painful lower premolars and molars
This study will see if total pulpotomy, radicular pulpotomy, or root canal treatment best controls postoperative pain and leads to successful outcomes for people aged 15–45 with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular premolars and molars.
-
Using pre-operative findings and AI to predict whether full pulpotomy will succeed in painful mature molars
We will test whether pre-surgery clinical signs and an AI read of dental X-rays can predict if full pulpotomy will work for adults with irreversible pulpitis in mature molars.
-
Menstrual phase and how well lower-jaw dental anesthesia works
This research will test whether different menstrual cycle phases change how well an inferior alveolar nerve block works for women (20–40) with painful irreversible pulpitis in lower molars.
-
How French dentists treat infected or non-vital baby (primary) teeth
See how dentists in France treat children’s non-vital or infected primary teeth and what leads them to choose extraction, pulpectomy, or other options.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.