Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 40

Comparing flap closure methods after impacted lower wisdom tooth removal

Official title: The Effect of Different Flap Closure Techniques on Postoperative Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Impacted Third Molar Surgery

Run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University · NCT07198282 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial will test whether four flap closure methods—traditional sutures, leaving the wound open, a small surgical drain, or a cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive—reduce pain, swelling, limited mouth opening, and improve recovery for healthy adults (18–40) having an impacted lower third molar removed.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 40 Years
SexAll
Enrollment148 (estimated)
SponsorRecep Tayyip Erdogan University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Rize, Rize Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 8, 2026
Main results expectedAugust 15, 2026
Study endsAugust 30, 2026
Registry record updatedJune 9, 2026
Trial IDNCT07198282 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Healthy adults aged 18–40 (ASA I) with an impacted mandibular third molar in similar positions (Pell & Gregory Class 2, Position B; vertical or mesioangular) are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are older or have systemic illness (ASA II–IV), active local infection, heavy tobacco or alcohol use, pregnancy, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, coagulation or immunosuppressive disorders, or known allergy to acrylates are unlikely to qualify or benefit from this protocol.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a randomized controlled trial that assigns patients to one of four commonly used flap closure techniques following extraction of a similarly positioned impacted mandibular third molar. Outcomes include postoperative pain, facial swelling, trismus (limited mouth opening), wound healing, and patient-reported oral health quality of life (GOHAI) measured at scheduled follow-ups. The four interventions compared are conventional silk suturing, a sutureless approach (secondary intention), placement of a surgical drain, and closure with a high-viscosity cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Eligible participants are healthy adults (ASA I) aged 18–40 with specific impaction classifications, and the procedures and follow-ups take place at a single university oral surgery department.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the best flap closure method could reduce early postoperative pain and swelling and speed recovery after impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction.

How similar studies have gone: Previous clinical comparisons of sutures versus sutureless closure, tissue adhesives, and drains exist with mixed results—some trials report modest improvements with cyanoacrylate or sutureless techniques but findings are inconsistent.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients aged 18-40 years.
* Patients with no systemic diseases (ASA I).
* Patients with impacted mandibular third molars indicated for extraction, with bone and/or mucosal retention, in similar positions (Pell \& Gregory Class 2, Position B; Winter classification vertical or mesioangular).

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients classified as ASA II, III, or IV.
* Known allergy to anesthetic solutions.
* Allergy to acrylate.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Individuals with tobacco use ≥10 cigarettes/day.
* Alcohol users.
* Patients using antiplatelet agents.
* Patients using anticoagulants.
* Patients with coagulation disorders.
* Patients with immunosuppressive diseases or receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

Patients with acute pain or local infection at the surgical site.

Where it's running

  • Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Rize, Rize Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.