Comparing flap closure methods after impacted lower wisdom tooth removal
Official title: The Effect of Different Flap Closure Techniques on Postoperative Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Impacted Third Molar Surgery
Run by Recep Tayyip Erdogan University · NCT07198282 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether four flap closure methods—traditional sutures, leaving the wound open, a small surgical drain, or a cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive—reduce pain, swelling, limited mouth opening, and improve recovery for healthy adults (18–40) having an impacted lower third molar removed.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 148 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Rize, Rize Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 8, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07198282 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Healthy adults aged 18–40 (ASA I) with an impacted mandibular third molar in similar positions (Pell & Gregory Class 2, Position B; vertical or mesioangular) are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are older or have systemic illness (ASA II–IV), active local infection, heavy tobacco or alcohol use, pregnancy, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, coagulation or immunosuppressive disorders, or known allergy to acrylates are unlikely to qualify or benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a randomized controlled trial that assigns patients to one of four commonly used flap closure techniques following extraction of a similarly positioned impacted mandibular third molar. Outcomes include postoperative pain, facial swelling, trismus (limited mouth opening), wound healing, and patient-reported oral health quality of life (GOHAI) measured at scheduled follow-ups. The four interventions compared are conventional silk suturing, a sutureless approach (secondary intention), placement of a surgical drain, and closure with a high-viscosity cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Eligible participants are healthy adults (ASA I) aged 18–40 with specific impaction classifications, and the procedures and follow-ups take place at a single university oral surgery department.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the best flap closure method could reduce early postoperative pain and swelling and speed recovery after impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction.
How similar studies have gone: Previous clinical comparisons of sutures versus sutureless closure, tissue adhesives, and drains exist with mixed results—some trials report modest improvements with cyanoacrylate or sutureless techniques but findings are inconsistent.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18-40 years. * Patients with no systemic diseases (ASA I). * Patients with impacted mandibular third molars indicated for extraction, with bone and/or mucosal retention, in similar positions (Pell \& Gregory Class 2, Position B; Winter classification vertical or mesioangular). Exclusion Criteria: * Patients classified as ASA II, III, or IV. * Known allergy to anesthetic solutions. * Allergy to acrylate. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Individuals with tobacco use ≥10 cigarettes/day. * Alcohol users. * Patients using antiplatelet agents. * Patients using anticoagulants. * Patients with coagulation disorders. * Patients with immunosuppressive diseases or receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Patients with acute pain or local infection at the surgical site.
Where it's running
-
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Rize, Rize Province, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Alperen Kalyoncu, Assistant Professor
- Email: alperen.kalyoncu@erdogan.edu.tr
- Phone: +905058261967
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Preoperative heart pumping power and P-POSSUM surgical risk score
We will test whether a quick preoperative measure of heart pumping power (cardiac power output) can help predict complications and death after abdominal surgery in people aged 65 and older.
-
Healing the palatal donor site after a free gingival graft using a topical steroid
This trial will test whether applying topical triamcinolone acetonide to the palatal donor site helps adults having free gingival graft surgery heal faster and with less pain than a standard collagen sponge.
-
Can virtual reality with hypnotic scripts ease dental anxiety during wisdom tooth removal?
This trial tests whether using virtual reality with hypnotic scripts can lower anxiety and pain for adults undergoing wisdom tooth extraction compared with standard local anesthesia alone.
-
Determinants of postoperative complications after major non-cardiac surgery in a large patient group
This analysis tests which patient factors are linked to postoperative complications after major non-cardiac surgery using data from the OPHIQUE study.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.