Comparing early versus delayed gallbladder surgery in severe pancreatitis
Official title: Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis (CHISPA): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Run by Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi · NCT06113419 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether having gallbladder surgery right after being hospitalized for severe pancreatitis is better than waiting about a month to see if it leads to fewer complications and a quicker recovery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 134 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Bogota, Cundinamarca and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | April 2027 |
| Study ends | July 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06113419 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 and older diagnosed with moderately severe or severe pancreatitis and biliary pancreatitis confirmed by imaging.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with chronic pancreatitis, active malignant disease, or those who have had previous gallbladder surgery will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 72 hours of hospitalization against interval cholecystectomy scheduled approximately 30 days after recovery from pancreatitis. It will evaluate major complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification, alongside secondary outcomes such as minor complications, recurrence of biliary disease, mortality rates, and length of hospital stay. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two surgical timing groups, and an intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of each approach.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for patients with severe pancreatitis requiring gallbladder removal.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have explored surgical timing in pancreatitis, but this specific comparison of early versus interval cholecystectomy is less common, making it a potentially novel approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years, diagnosis of pancreatitis according to Atlanta guidelines, moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (APACHE score ≥8 on admittance) * Biliary pancreatitis diagnosed on imaging (be it ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and/or tomography) * Recovery of pancreatitis by tolerance of oral intake (defined as 24 hours of food consumption of any consistency without emetic episodes and pain defined as 4/10 on the visual analogue score of pain) and written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy * History of cholecystectomy * Planned open cholecystectomy * Pancreatitis-associated complication before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (compartment syndrome, bleeding and/or need for peripancreatic collection drainage) * Chronic pancreatitis, * More than one episode of pancreatitis * Active malignant disease * Septic shock * Choledocholithiasis not resolved by ERCP, post-ERCP perforation and post-ERCP concomitant pancreatitis.
Where it's running
-
Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia Recruiting -
Hospital Universitario Méderi Barrios Unidos
Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Camilo Ramirez-Giraldo, MD — Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
- Study coordinator: Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, MD
- Email: ramirezgiraldocamilo@gmail.com
- Phone: +5773206770474
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Gallbladder Surgery
This study observes how surgeon experience relates to patterns of electrosurgery use during elective laparoscopic gallbladder removal to see if experience affects intraoperative difficulty.
-
Local complications of acute pancreatitis and postoperative pancreatic fistula: what happens in real life
This multicenter registry tests how local pancreatic complications are managed in routine care and what outcomes look like over 180 days for adults.
-
Improvised retrieval bag vs direct gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
This trial tests whether using an improvised retrieval bag to remove the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as safe and effective as removing it directly without a bag in adults with gallbladder stones.
-
SGC001 is being tested to help predicted severe acute pancreatitis
Researchers are testing SGC001 vs placebo in adults with predicted severe acute pancreatitis to see if it is safe and tolerable and to get a sense of any early effects.
-
Time to Lose Consciousness With Remimazolam vs Propofol for Anesthetic Induction
This study tests whether remimazolam changes the time to loss of consciousness compared with propofol for anesthesia induction in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic gallbladder removal.
-
Camera-based non-contact vital sign monitoring during surgery
This project will try a camera-based non-contact system to measure heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen levels in adults having surgery under general anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.