Comparing early and delayed parenteral nutrition after emergency abdominal surgery
Official title: Early Versus Postponed Supplementary Parenteral Nutrition After Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
Run by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev · NCT06089551 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing whether starting nutrition support right after emergency abdominal surgery helps patients recover better than waiting a few days to start it.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 342 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Herlev) |
| Trial ID | NCT06089551 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 who have undergone emergency midline laparotomy or laparoscopy and are unable to meet their caloric needs postoperatively.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have contraindications for oral or enteral nutrition or those with a very limited expected remaining time of living may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study investigates the effects of early versus postponed supplementary parenteral nutrition in patients who have undergone emergency laparotomy. Participants will be randomized on the second postoperative day based on their calorie intake, with one group receiving parenteral nutrition immediately and the other starting it on the fifth postoperative day if their intake remains insufficient. The goal is to achieve a combined calorie intake of 70-80% of the calculated requirement through oral, enteral, and parenteral means. The study aims to determine the optimal timing for initiating parenteral nutrition to improve patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could optimize nutritional support for patients recovering from major abdominal surgery, potentially leading to better recovery outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: While there is limited data on the optimal timing of parenteral nutrition, similar studies have shown varying results, indicating that this approach may provide new insights into nutritional management post-surgery.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 18 * Emergency primary midline laparotomy or laparoscopy * NRS-2002 (nutritional risk screening) score \< 7 * No contraindications for oral or enteral nutrition after surgery * Unable to tolerate or take in at least 50% of calculated calorie requirement on postoperative day 2 * Capable of providing informed consent at the time of inclusion Exclusion Criteria: * Laparotomy without closure of the abdominal aponeurosis * Laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy as the procedure * Limiting mental or psychiatric disorders rendering participation unethical or unrealistic * Patients with a very limited expected remaining time of living (\< 3 months) * NRS-2002 = 7 * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Refusal to participate
Where it's running
-
Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Denmark Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jannick B Hansen, M.D. — Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Study coordinator: Jannick B Hansen, M.D.
- Email: jannick.brander.hansen@regionh.dk
- Phone: +4538686862
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dexa vs Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine in TAP Block for Laparotomy Analgesia
This study tests whether adding dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in a TAP block improves postoperative pain control after laparotomy.
-
Translesional pressure measurements to see whether a mesenteric artery narrowing causes symptoms.
This study will test whether measuring the pressure across a narrowed mesenteric artery helps identify which adults with chronic mesenteric ischemia who are scheduled for endovascular treatment will benefit from treatment.
-
Comparing two pain relief methods for open colon surgery
This study is testing whether a single dose of spinal morphine or continuous epidural pain relief works better for managing pain after open colon surgery for cancer patients.
-
Registry to assess outcomes of the MagDI System for bowel surgery
This study is trying to see how well the MagDI System works for bowel surgery and if it causes fewer problems like internal hernias and blockages in patients in the U.S. compared to past studies.
-
Removal of the primary small-intestine neuroendocrine tumor versus systemic therapy alone
This project tries to see if removing the main small-intestine neuroendocrine tumor helps people with incurable metastatic disease live longer or avoid future problems, compared with treating them with systemic therapy alone.
-
Comparing two methods of pain relief after abdominal surgery
This study is testing two different ways to give pain relief after abdominal surgery to see which one helps patients feel better and recover faster.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.