Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

Comparing drug-coated balloons and stents for heart artery blockages at branching points

Official title: Drug Coated Balloons in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. A Feasibility Study Looking at Computational Flow Dynamics, Ischaemic and Anatomical Changes to the Bifurcation

Run by University of East Anglia · NCT06971718 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether drug-coated balloons or drug-eluting stents work better for treating tough blockages in heart arteries where they branch, focusing on patients with different types of heart issues.

More Coronary Bifurcation Lesion trials

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment24 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of East Anglia
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Norwich, Norfolk)
StatusRecruiting
StartedOctober 10, 2023
Main results expectedJune 1, 2026
Study endsJune 1, 2026
Registry record updatedMay 14, 2025
Trial IDNCT06971718 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates include adults aged 18 and over with specific bifurcation lesions suitable for a provisional main vessel treatment strategy.

Probably not a fit

Patients experiencing cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure, or those unable to consent will not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in treating coronary bifurcation lesions, which are challenging blockages at branching points of the coronary arteries. Using advanced imaging techniques, the study will create computational models to assess blood flow dynamics before and after treatment. Patients with stable angina, silent ischemia, unstable angina, or NSTEMI will be monitored to determine which treatment option provides better outcomes. The study will involve a follow-up period to gather data on patient recovery and treatment efficacy.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a safer and more effective treatment option for patients with complex coronary artery blockages.

How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown promising results with drug-coated balloons in similar contexts, suggesting potential for success in this approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18 or over
* Any bifurcation lesion amenable to a provisional main vessel treatment strategy
* A main vessel diameter of 2.5mm or more and side branch diameter of \>2mm
* Any patient with stable angina, silent ischaemia, unstable angina or NSTEMI
* Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Cardiogenic shock
* LVEF \<30%
* STEMI (as unable to give informed consent)
* eGFR \<30
* Severe asthma contraindicating use of adenosine
* High degree AV block on 12 lead ECG precluding the use of adenosine
* Pregnancy
* Inability to consent
* Left main stem coronary bifurcation lesions

Where it's running

  • Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
    Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

  • Comparing mini-crush and controlled balloon-crush techniques for treating coronary bifurcation lesions

    This study is testing whether two different stenting techniques, mini-crush and controlled balloon-crush, work better for treating complex heart artery blockages in people with coronary bifurcation lesions.

    Recruiting Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital · Istanbul · NCT06880978

  • Registry for treating coronary bifurcation lesions

    This study collects information on how different treatment methods for coronary bifurcation lesions work for patients getting heart procedures, to see which approaches are most effective.

    Recruiting Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · Minneapolis, Minnesota · NCT05100992

  • IVUS-Guided Left Main Stenting: IVUS-Guided vs Trained-Eye Approach

    This trial tests whether using IVUS to guide left main bifurcation stenting is as good as using an angiography-driven, experience-based approach by an IVUS-savvy operator.

    Recruiting Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health · Saint Petersburg · NCT07711106

  • Crossover vs Accurate Ostial Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

    This observational study tests two stenting strategies for ostial lesions in the left main coronary artery to see which approach works better for patients with left main bifurcation disease.

    Recruiting Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital · Istanbul, Please Select and 1 other locations · NCT07596706

  • Using Sirolimus-Coated Balloons for Treating Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

    This study is testing whether Sirolimus-coated balloons are safer and more effective than Paclitaxel-coated balloons for treating specific heart artery blockages in 280 patients.

    Recruiting Dongguan TT Medical · Beijing, Beijing Municipality · NCT06618248

  • Comparing two strategies for treating coronary bifurcation lesions

    This study is testing whether a new treatment using drug-eluting balloons is better than a two-stent approach for people with specific heart artery blockages to see which method helps them more and has fewer problems.

    Recruiting Cathreine BV · Eindhoven, North Brabant · NCT05731687

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.