Comparing CSF shunts and dural venous sinus stents for IIH
Official title: Intervention To Preserve Vision In Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Evaluation Of Clinical Effectiveness And Cost Effectiveness (IIH Intervention)
Run by University of Birmingham · NCT07440277 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This will test whether a CSF shunt or a dural venous sinus stent better reduces pressure and preserves vision in adults with IIH who have severe papilloedema and are at risk of vision loss.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 63 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Birmingham Academic / other |
| Locations | 15 sites (Birmingham and 14 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 18, 2023 |
| Main results expected | August 28, 2027 |
| Study ends | May 28, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | February 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07440277 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18–64 with IIH per consensus guidelines who have Frisén grade ≥3 papilloedema in at least one eye and are judged suitable for both CSF shunting and DVSS are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with current venous sinus thrombosis, previous IIH surgery, recent bariatric surgery, significant pre-existing eye disease affecting the study eye, or those outside the 18–64 age range or not suitable for both procedures are unlikely to benefit from enrollment.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This trial compares two interventional procedures—CSF shunting (ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal) and dural venous sinus stenting (DVSS)—for adults with IIH and clinically significant papilloedema. Adults aged 18–64 who meet IIH consensus criteria with Frisén grade ≥3 papilloedema and who are suitable for both procedures are enrolled and assigned to one of the treatments. The study will collect clinical outcomes related to intracranial pressure, visual function and complications, as well as health‑care resource use to compare cost-effectiveness. Recruitment is taking place at NHS centres including Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Bristol Eye Hospital and Southmead Hospital.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could show which procedure better preserves vision and reduces symptoms while using health-care resources more efficiently.
How similar studies have gone: CSF shunting is an established intervention and DVSS has shown promising results in observational series, but direct randomized comparisons between the two are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of IIH by the IIH consensus guidelines with papilloedema and at risk of visual loss. 2. Presence of papilloedema (Frisén grade ≥ 3) in at least one eye 3. Age 18 to \< 64 years at the time of consent. 4. Patients must be suitable for and willing to proceed with both CSF shunting (VP or Lumboperitoneal shunts only) and DVSS. 5. Able to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of current venous sinus thrombosis on diagnostic brain imaging by either MRI, MRV or CTV 2. Previous surgery for IIH including, optic nerve sheath fenestration, CSF shunting procedures, sub-temporal decompression and DVSS. 3. Previous bariatric surgery within the last 3 months 4. Patients with a past ophthalmic history, except refraction error, affecting the eligible eyes (study eyes) that could affect the vision. 5. Patient is, at the time of signing the informed consent, a user of recreational or illicit drugs (including marijuana) or has had a recent history (within the last year) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence, in the opinion of the investigator. 6. History of any clinically significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, or influence the results or the subject's ability to participate in the study. 7. Have participated in any other interventional study within 30 days prior to the screening visit (of note participation in the IIH Life database or other observational studies will not prevent enrolment to this study). 8. Previous randomisation for treatment in the present study. 9. Pregnant. 10. Absolute or serious contraindication to standard anti-thrombotic regimen peri and post stenting. 11. Secondary causes of raised intracranial pressure. (Refer to Protocol appendix 3 for additional information.) 12. History of significant documented iodine-based contrast allergy. 13. History of documented allergy to nitinol or nickel. 14. Absolute or serious contraindication for general anaesthesia. 15. Previous diagnosis of a hypercoagulable state (Factor V Leiden, Protein C or S deficiency, Anticardiolipin antibodies, Lupus anticoagulant, B2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, or Hyperhomocysteinaemia). 16. Currently requiring full anticoagulation for other medical reasons, such as atrial fibrillation, artificial valves, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. 17. Documented prior non-traumatic intracranial haemorrhage. 18. History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (within the last 24 months). 19. History of severe carotid atherosclerotic disease. 20. History of heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease, etc. that are assessed as at high thrombotic risk. 21. Presence of intracranial vascular malformation considered clinically symptomatic (current or within 24 months). 22. Anatomical anomaly of the venous sinus which would prevent safe catheterisation and stenting (e.g. multi-channel sinus).
Where it's running
-
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, United Kingdom Recruiting -
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Princess Alexandra Eye Pavillion
Edinburgh, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Hull Infirmary
Hull, United Kingdom Recruiting
Show 9 more locations
-
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, United Kingdom Recruiting -
King's College Hospital
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery
London, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Sunderland Eye Infirmary
Sunderland, United Kingdom Recruiting -
Bristol Eye Hospital
Bristol, United Kingdom Not yet recruiting -
Southmead Hospital
Bristol, United Kingdom Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Alexandra Sinclair, MBChB, FRCP, PhD
- Email: a.b.sinclair@bham.ac.uk
- Phone: +44 121 414 8040
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Obesity and Muscle Signaling After a Single Workout and Protein Drink
This study tests whether skeletal muscle signaling after resistance exercise and protein intake differs between lean adults and those who are overweight or obese.
-
How well a peptide supplement helps resistance training grow muscle
This trial tests whether adding a peptide supplement to a regular resistance-training program helps young adults build more muscle than training alone.
-
Multi-arm platform for relapsed neuroblastoma
This trial will try several drug combinations (including bevacizumab, dinutuximab beta, irinotecan, topotecan and temozolomide) to see if they help children and young adults with relapsed high‑risk neuroblastoma.
-
Whey protein before meals to improve blood sugar in older adults with type 2 diabetes
This study will try giving people aged 75–90 with type 2 diabetes a whey protein supplement before meals to see if it improves daily blood sugar control compared with a protein-free placebo.
-
Group Traumatic Episode Protocol for birth-related trauma
This program will try online Group Traumatic Episode Protocol (GTEP) to reduce trauma symptoms and improve wellbeing and parent-infant bonding for people who experienced a traumatic birth in the past 18 months.
-
Can apixaban prevent blood clots in ambulatory lung cancer patients on chemotherapy?
This trial tests whether taking apixaban can reduce blood clots in people with lung cancer who are receiving chemotherapy, compared with a placebo.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.