Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 to 60

Comparing clinical provocation tests and ultrasound for diagnosing tennis elbow

Official title: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Clinical Tests and the Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

Run by Marmara University · NCT07347873 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether common physical provocation tests and ultrasound can accurately diagnose tennis elbow in adults with one-sided elbow pain.

More Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (Tennis Elbow) trials

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Enrollment100 (estimated)
SponsorMarmara University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Istanbul, Maltepe)
StatusRecruiting
StartedOctober 17, 2025
Main results expectedJanuary 31, 2026
Study endsMarch 26, 2026
Registry record updatedJanuary 16, 2026
Trial IDNCT07347873 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults 18–60 with one-sided elbow pain, tenderness at the lateral epicondyle, and pain provoked by pressure compared with the opposite side are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

People with rheumatologic conditions, prior corticosteroid injections to the lateral epicondyle, previous elbow surgery or infection, bilateral symptoms, or those outside the 18–60 age range may not benefit from this study's findings.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This observational diagnostic accuracy study will measure how well physical provocation tests (such as Cozen's, Mill's, and Maudsley tests) and musculoskeletal ultrasound identify lateral elbow tendinopathy. Adults aged 18–60 with unilateral lateral epicondyle tenderness and pain provoked by algometer pressure will be enrolled, while people with rheumatologic disease, prior corticosteroid injections at the lateral epicondyle, prior elbow surgery, or infection are excluded. Test results will be compared to a reference standard to calculate sensitivity and specificity for each clinical and imaging test. The goal is to clarify which bedside or imaging methods are most reliable for diagnosing LET in routine clinic settings.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, clinicians could use simple exam maneuvers or ultrasound more confidently to diagnose tennis elbow and avoid unnecessary additional testing.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research has reported mixed accuracy for both provocation tests and ultrasound, so while these methods are commonly used, their diagnostic performance is not definitively established.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients aged 18-60 with unilateral elbow pain
* Tenderness with palpation at the lateral epicondyle
* Pain triggered with pressure compared to the opposite lateral epicondyle with algometer.

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of rheumatologic diseases
* History of e corticosteroid injections on lateral epicondyle
* History of elbow surgery or infection

Where it's running

  • Marmara University
    Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: İlker Yağcı, Prof. M.D. — Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital
  • Study coordinator: Arda Can Kasap, M.D.
  • Email: drardakasap@gmail.com
  • Phone: +902166254545

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.