Comparing Cailliet and Kendall exercises for neck pain relief
Official title: Comparative Effects of Cailliet and Kendall Exercises on Pain, Functional Movement and Disability in Nonspecific Neck Pain: Randomized Control Trial
Run by Riphah International University · NCT06875856 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing which exercise program, Cailliet or Kendall, helps people aged 25 to 40 with long-lasting neck pain feel better after four weeks of treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 32 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 22, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 3, 2025 |
| Study ends | September 15, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | March 13, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06875856 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are individuals aged 25 to 40 years with localized neck pain or stiffness lasting more than three months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with serious underlying conditions such as cancer, tuberculosis, or recent cervical spine surgery may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Cailliet and Kendall exercise regimes on alleviating nonspecific neck pain. Conducted at Good Hands Physiotherapy Clinic in Lahore, the study will involve 36 participants aged 25 to 40 years who have experienced localized neck pain for over three months. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Cailliet or Kendall exercise group, both receiving baseline treatments including hot packs and TENS. The outcomes will be measured using pain scales and functional movement assessments after a treatment period of four weeks.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with effective exercise-based interventions for managing nonspecific neck pain.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown mixed results regarding exercise interventions for neck pain, indicating that this approach is both relevant and necessary for further exploration.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age group between 18 to 40 years * Both gender male and female * Individuals having localized pain or stiffness in spine or both combined between C3 and C7 without upper limb radiculopathy * Negative Spurling's test, traction test, upper limb tension test, and shoulder abduction test. * Pain reported on NPRS Moderate score in neck region for more than 3 months * Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 0-10 points out of 50 score Exclusion Criteria: * Tuberculosis, carcinoma, heart disease, and osteoporosis * Neural disorders due to prolapsed intervertebral disc * Any trauma, localized infection or history of surgery in cervical spine region in last 6 months * Upper motor neuron disease, cervical stenosis, and metabolic diseases in bone and joint * Hyper flexibility, Open sores * Ongoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, steroid therapy, or anticoagulants * Psychiatric diseases such as phobia/obsession and depression * Allergy to hot pack
Where it's running
-
Good hands physiotherapy clinic
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ghulam Fatima, PHD* — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, PHD*
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Mobilization Techniques for Nonspecific Neck Pain: Effects on Endurance and Function
This study tests whether two manual therapy techniques (PRT and İASTM) can improve neck muscle endurance and function in healthy desk workers with low neck pain risk.
-
Telerehabilitation vs. supervised rehabilitation for patellofemoral pain syndrome
This study tests whether remote exercise therapy can work as well as in-person supervised rehab for people with patellofemoral pain.
-
Vestibular Stimulation vs Core Stability Training for Sitting Balance in Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether vestibular stimulation or core stability training helps improve sitting balance in young children with hypotonic cerebral palsy.
-
Hybrid mobile health and telerehabilitation vs in-person physiotherapy for shoulder pain
This study tests whether a mobile-health program, tele-rehabilitation sessions, or conventional physiotherapy can help adults with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.
-
Telerehabilitation vs clinic-based physiotherapy for children with spastic cerebral palsy
This study tests whether structured telerehabilitation can be as effective as in-clinic physiotherapy for improving movement in children aged 4–12 with spastic cerebral palsy.
-
tDCS plus Action Observation Therapy for leg function in children with diplegic CP
This study tests whether adding active brain stimulation to action observation therapy can improve leg movement in kids with diplegic cerebral palsy better than a sham stimulation with the same therapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.