Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing CABG and PCI for severe coronary artery disease and heart failure

Official title: The CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (STICH) 3.0 International Trial Consortium

Run by Vastra Gotaland Region · NCT05761067 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether heart surgery or a less invasive procedure is better at helping people with severe heart disease and heart failure live longer.

More Heart Failure trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment2800 (estimated)
SponsorVastra Gotaland Region
Government
Locations1 site (Gothenburg)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 14, 2022
Main results expectedSeptember 14, 2029
Study endsSeptember 14, 2029
Registry record updatedSeptember 25, 2024
Trial IDNCT05761067 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are adults over 18 years old with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less and extensive coronary artery disease.

Probably not a fit

Patients with decompensated heart failure requiring intensive support, significant valvular heart disease, or those at high risk for bleeding may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

The STICH 3.0 study aims to determine if coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is more effective than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in reducing all-cause mortality over five years in patients with severe coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular systolic function. This study will pool and analyze individual patient data from various national randomized controlled trials to provide a comprehensive comparison of these two treatment methods. The primary focus is on long-term outcomes, particularly mortality rates, to address existing inconsistencies in observational studies regarding these interventions.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide clearer guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with severe coronary artery disease and heart failure, potentially improving survival rates.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have indicated that CABG may offer better long-term outcomes compared to PCI, but this specific comparison in a randomized controlled setting is novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age \>18 years
* LVEF ≤40%
* Extensive coronary artery disease (typically defined as a British Cardiovascular Intervention Society jeopardy score of ≥6, on a scale from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater extent of disease).

Exclusion Criteria:

* Decompensated heart failure requiring inotropic/adrenergic support, invasive or non-invasive ventilation or intra-aortic balloon pump/ ventricular assist device therapy less than 48 hours prior to randomization;
* Valvular heart disease or any other cardiac conditions (e.g. LV aneurysm) indicating the need for surgical repair/replacement;
* Prohibitive bleeding risk or clinical scenario mandating avoidance of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy;
* Pregnancy;
* Circumstances likely to lead to poor treatment adherence;
* STEMI within 72 hours;
* PCI within 3 months.

Where it's running

  • Dep of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.