Comparing CABG and PCI for severe coronary artery disease and heart failure
Official title: The CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (STICH) 3.0 International Trial Consortium
Run by Vastra Gotaland Region · NCT05761067 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether heart surgery or a less invasive procedure is better at helping people with severe heart disease and heart failure live longer.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 2800 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Vastra Gotaland Region Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Gothenburg) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 14, 2022 |
| Main results expected | September 14, 2029 |
| Study ends | September 14, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | September 25, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT05761067 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults over 18 years old with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less and extensive coronary artery disease.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with decompensated heart failure requiring intensive support, significant valvular heart disease, or those at high risk for bleeding may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The STICH 3.0 study aims to determine if coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is more effective than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in reducing all-cause mortality over five years in patients with severe coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular systolic function. This study will pool and analyze individual patient data from various national randomized controlled trials to provide a comprehensive comparison of these two treatment methods. The primary focus is on long-term outcomes, particularly mortality rates, to address existing inconsistencies in observational studies regarding these interventions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide clearer guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with severe coronary artery disease and heart failure, potentially improving survival rates.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have indicated that CABG may offer better long-term outcomes compared to PCI, but this specific comparison in a randomized controlled setting is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \>18 years * LVEF ≤40% * Extensive coronary artery disease (typically defined as a British Cardiovascular Intervention Society jeopardy score of ≥6, on a scale from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater extent of disease). Exclusion Criteria: * Decompensated heart failure requiring inotropic/adrenergic support, invasive or non-invasive ventilation or intra-aortic balloon pump/ ventricular assist device therapy less than 48 hours prior to randomization; * Valvular heart disease or any other cardiac conditions (e.g. LV aneurysm) indicating the need for surgical repair/replacement; * Prohibitive bleeding risk or clinical scenario mandating avoidance of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy; * Pregnancy; * Circumstances likely to lead to poor treatment adherence; * STEMI within 72 hours; * PCI within 3 months.
Where it's running
-
Dep of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, Sweden Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Björn Redfors, MD, PhD
- Email: bjorn.redfors@wlab.gu.se
- Phone: +46 313421000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Impact of a Clinical Information System on hospital outcomes for adults with chronic diseases
This study tests whether implementing a Clinical Information System helps reduce readmissions or death within 30 days after hospital discharge for adults with chronic conditions in Alberta.
-
Bypass surgery versus stents for people with weak heart pumping and blockages in multiple coronary arteries
This trial tests whether bypass surgery (CABG) or stents (PCI) lead to better survival, fewer major heart problems, and improved quality of life for adults with reduced left ventricular function (LVEF ≤40%) and multivessel coronary disease.
-
Managing multiple medications in older adults with chronic diseases
This project will see if taking many different medicines changes the health outlook of people aged 65 and older who have chronic conditions.
-
Using Apple Watch data to predict heart failure outcomes
This study is testing if data from Apple Watches can help predict heart failure problems and the chances of needing to go back to the hospital for patients with heart failure.
-
Treatment for heart failure using patients' own fat-derived cells
This study is testing whether injecting patients' own fat cells can improve heart function in people with chronic heart failure compared to those getting standard medical treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.