Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing biological and synthetic mesh in pelvic prolapse surgery

Official title: Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery: a Multicentre, Phase 11-111, Partially Randomised Patient Preference Trial

Run by Meander Medical Center · NCT06430931 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether a new biological mesh works better than the standard synthetic mesh in surgeries for pelvic prolapse to help doctors make better choices for their patients.

More Colorectal Disorders trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment184 (estimated)
SponsorMeander Medical Center
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Amersfoort, Utrecht)
StatusRecruiting
StartedDecember 6, 2023
Main results expectedJuly 1, 2027
Study endsJuly 1, 2027
Registry record updatedJanuary 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT06430931 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates include patients indicated for VMR or SCR who have been counseled on their options and can provide informed consent.

Probably not a fit

Patients with a history of pelvic radiation therapy or those who have previously had pelvic floor meshes may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness of OviTex 1S, a biological mesh, against the standard polypropylene mesh in minimal-invasive ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and sacrocolporectopexy (SCR) procedures for pelvic prolapse. The study addresses the ongoing debate regarding the choice of mesh material, especially in light of recent FDA regulations affecting synthetic mesh. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either type of mesh, and outcomes will be assessed for recurrence rates and graft-related complications. The goal is to provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical decisions in pelvic floor surgery.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for patients undergoing pelvic prolapse surgery.

How similar studies have gone: While there is ongoing debate regarding mesh types, high-quality evidence comparing biological and synthetic meshes is currently lacking, making this approach relatively novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Indication for VMR or SCR set by the treating surgeon/gynecologist in accordance to the current guidelines on rectal and pelvic prolapse;
* Counselled for therapeutic options and given informed consent for VMR or SCR;
* Counselled for different types of mesh (OviTex or Prolene) and randomisation;
* Written informed consent for randomisation, OviTex implant or Prolene;
* Written informed consent for observational data collection.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Mentally incompetent patients (unable to fulfil questionnaires).
* Allergy to ovine rumen.
* A medical history of pelvic radiation therapy.
* Scheduled for a redo-rectopexy.
* A medical history of previously implanted pelvic floor meshes or native tissue.
* Language barrier

Where it's running

  • Meander Medisch Centrum
    Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.