Comparing biological and synthetic mesh in pelvic prolapse surgery
Official title: Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery: a Multicentre, Phase 11-111, Partially Randomised Patient Preference Trial
Run by Meander Medical Center · NCT06430931 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a new biological mesh works better than the standard synthetic mesh in surgeries for pelvic prolapse to help doctors make better choices for their patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 184 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Meander Medical Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Amersfoort, Utrecht) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 6, 2023 |
| Main results expected | July 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | January 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06430931 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include patients indicated for VMR or SCR who have been counseled on their options and can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a history of pelvic radiation therapy or those who have previously had pelvic floor meshes may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness of OviTex 1S, a biological mesh, against the standard polypropylene mesh in minimal-invasive ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and sacrocolporectopexy (SCR) procedures for pelvic prolapse. The study addresses the ongoing debate regarding the choice of mesh material, especially in light of recent FDA regulations affecting synthetic mesh. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either type of mesh, and outcomes will be assessed for recurrence rates and graft-related complications. The goal is to provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical decisions in pelvic floor surgery.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complications for patients undergoing pelvic prolapse surgery.
How similar studies have gone: While there is ongoing debate regarding mesh types, high-quality evidence comparing biological and synthetic meshes is currently lacking, making this approach relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Indication for VMR or SCR set by the treating surgeon/gynecologist in accordance to the current guidelines on rectal and pelvic prolapse; * Counselled for therapeutic options and given informed consent for VMR or SCR; * Counselled for different types of mesh (OviTex or Prolene) and randomisation; * Written informed consent for randomisation, OviTex implant or Prolene; * Written informed consent for observational data collection. Exclusion Criteria: * Mentally incompetent patients (unable to fulfil questionnaires). * Allergy to ovine rumen. * A medical history of pelvic radiation therapy. * Scheduled for a redo-rectopexy. * A medical history of previously implanted pelvic floor meshes or native tissue. * Language barrier
Where it's running
-
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Esther Consten, Prof.dr — Meander Medisch Centrum
- Study coordinator: Marije Boom, drs.
- Email: ma.boom@meandermc.nl
- Phone: + 31 33 850 1716
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Evaluation of the Anchorsure® Device for Treating Apical Prolapse in Women
This study is testing a new device called Anchorsure® to see if it can help women with pelvic organ prolapse have a quicker and less painful surgery while keeping everything securely in place.
-
Using human acellular dermal matrix for treating pelvic organ prolapse in women
This study is testing three different surgical options to see which one works best for women with pelvic organ prolapse.
-
Registry for patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse
This study is collecting information from patients with pelvic organ prolapse who are having a specific type of surgery to see how well it works and what problems might come up later.
-
Poly-L-lactic acid injections for vulvovaginal tissue regeneration
This trial will try injections of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) versus placebo to see if they strengthen vaginal tissue and reduce bulge symptoms and sexual problems in women with stage II anterior vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele).
-
vNOTE Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Suspension to Support Pelvic Organs
This study tests a vaginal natural orifice surgery technique for hysterectomy that includes upfront uterosacral suspension to help prevent pelvic organ prolapse.
-
Transanal versus Transvaginal rectal resection for anterior rectocele
This project will test two surgical techniques—stapled transanal and stapled transvaginal rectal resection—to see which better relieves obstructed defecation in women with anterior rectocele.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.