Clinical trial Recruiting at 29 sites Phase 3 Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing antibiotic cement bead pouches to negative pressure wound therapy for open tibia fractures

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Management of Severe Open Tibia Fracture Wounds

Run by University of Maryland, Baltimore · NCT05615844 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether using antibiotic cement bead pouches or negative pressure wound therapy helps people with severe open tibia fractures heal better and avoid complications after surgery.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment312 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore
Academic / other
Locations35 sites (Chandler, Arizona and 34 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 5, 2023
Main results expectedMarch 31, 2027
Study endsOctober 1, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 29, 2026
Trial IDNCT05615844 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older with severe open tibia fractures requiring multiple irrigation and debridement procedures.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are not likely to achieve limb salvage or have medical contraindications to the treatments being tested may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial involving 312 participants with severe open tibia fractures that require multiple surgeries for irrigation and debridement. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either an antibiotic bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for managing their open fracture wounds. The primary outcome will assess clinical status six months after randomization, focusing on complications such as mortality, amputation, reoperation, and fracture healing. Secondary outcomes will evaluate each component of the primary outcome independently, providing a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of both treatment methods.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this trial could lead to improved management strategies for open tibia fractures, potentially reducing infection rates and complications.

How similar studies have gone: Emerging comparative studies suggest that the antibiotic bead pouch may significantly reduce infection risk compared to NPWT, indicating potential success for this approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria are:

1. Patients 18 years of age or older.
2. Severe open tibia fracture requiring more than one irrigation and debridement procedure to treat the open fracture.
3. Planned internal or external fixation for definitive fracture management.
4. Formal surgical debridement within 72 hours of their injury.
5. Will have all planned fracture care surgeries performed by a participating surgeon or delegate.
6. Informed consent obtained.

The exclusion criteria are:

1. Due to the severity of injury, the treating surgeon does not believe limb salvage \>6 months is likely to be successful based on the emergency department or initial intraoperative assessment (prior to enrolment and randomization).
2. Medical contraindication to antibiotic beads, including previously known allergies or sensitivities to vancomycin and/or tobramycin.
3. Medical or injury contraindication to NPWT. Injury contraindications could include situations in which the NPWT could not be placed over a vascular graft or exposed neurovascular structure.
4. Received previous surgical debridement or management of their fracture at a non-participating hospital or clinic (as applicable).
5. Chronic or acute infection at or near the fracture site at the time of initial fracture surgery.
6. Incarceration.
7. Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant within the next 6 months.
8. Currently enrolled in a study that does not permit co-enrollment.
9. Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barriers.
10. Anticipated problems, in the judgment of research personnel, with maintaining follow-up with the patient.
11. Prior enrollment in the trial.
12. Other reason to exclude the patient, as approved by the Methods Center.

Where it's running

  • Dignity Health Chandler Regional Medical Center
    Chandler, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of California, Davis
    Davis, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of California, Irvine
    Orange, California, United States
    Recruiting
Show 29 more locations
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Florida Health Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida, United States
    Recruiting
  • Indiana University
    Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Maryland Capital Region Health
    Largo, Maryland, United States
    Recruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Mississippi
    University, Mississippi, United States
    Recruiting
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
    Recruiting
  • Sanford Medical Center
    Fargo, North Dakota, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    Recruiting
  • Bon Secours Mercy Health
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    Recruiting
  • Slocum Center
    Eugene, Oregon, United States
    Recruiting
  • Ortegon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon, United States
    Recruiting
  • Prisma Health - Midlands
    Columbia, South Carolina, United States
    Recruiting
  • Prisma Health
    Greenville, South Carolina, United States
    Recruiting
  • Sanford Health
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    Recruiting
  • Inova Fairfax
    Falls Church, Virginia, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Recruiting
  • Hamilton Health Sciences
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Recruiting
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Recruiting
  • The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Recruiting
  • Yale University
    New Haven, Connecticut, United States
    Withdrawn
  • Bryan Medical Center
    Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
    Completed
  • University Medical Center of Southern Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
    Withdrawn
  • St. Luke's University Health Network
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
    Withdrawn
  • University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin, United States
    Withdrawn
  • Royal Columbian Hospital
    New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
    Completed

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.