Comparing a new hemostatic powder to standard treatment for bleeding ulcers
Official title: Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Non-Inferiority Trial of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) vs. Conventional Treatment as First-Line Endoscopic Therapy for Patients With High-Risk Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (TREET)
Run by Medtronic - MITG · NCT06188585 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing a new hemostatic powder to see if it works as well as standard treatment for adults with bleeding ulcers.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 278 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Medtronic - MITG Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 14 sites (New Haven, Connecticut and 13 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 21, 2024 |
| Main results expected | August 2029 |
| Study ends | September 2029 |
| Registry record updated | June 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06188585 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 22 years or older who present with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric or duodenal ulcers.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are pregnant, nursing, or unable to provide informed consent will not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial is a multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of UI-EWD hemostatic powder (Nexpowder™) compared to conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric or duodenal ulcers. Participants will be adults presenting with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel identified during endoscopy. The study will assess the primary outcome of hemostasis and rebleeding rates between the two treatment approaches. The trial is designed to provide insights into whether the new powder can serve as an effective first-line therapy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment option for patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, potentially reducing rebleeding rates.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown promising results with UI-EWD hemostatic powder, indicating that this approach may be effective, though this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults age 22 years or older 2. Presentation with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia) 3. Subject voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical investigation, provides written informed consent, and will be able to comply with the investigational protocol in the opinion of the site investigator 4. Cause of bleeding as determined at upper endoscopy is one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear. The definition of "active oozing" will require bleeding to persist for ≥ 3 minutes of endoscopic observation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Incarceration 2. Subjects that are not able to provide written informed consent 3. Pregnancy or nursing mothers 4. Endoscopic hemostatic treatment in the past 30 days 5. Use of triple antithrombotic therapy at the time of presentation 6. Subjects who underwent gastric or duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures within the past 2 months 7. Post-polypectomy bleeding 8. Subjects with erosive esophagitis, erosive gastritis, esophageal ulcer, or vascular ectasia including gastric antral vascular ectasia 9. Platelet count \< 50 x 10\^9/L 10. INR \> 3.5 (or prothrombin time \>35 seconds in patient not on warfarin and only prothrombin time is provided by local lab), at time of procedure or closest to procedure time 11. Subjects who have documented galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption 12. Subjects with documented hypersensitivity to Brilliant Blue FCF 13. Subjects with suspected bowel obstruction or gastrointestinal fistulas, and those suspected or are at high risk of having gastrointestinal perforation. 14. Endoscopy not performed within 36 hours of presentation to hospital/emergency department
Where it's running
-
Yale
New Haven, Connecticut, United States Recruiting -
RUSH University
Chicago, Illinois, United States Recruiting -
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States Recruiting -
Rutgers University
Piscataway, New Jersey, United States Recruiting -
Northwell Health
Manhasset, New York, United States Recruiting -
NYU Langone
New York, New York, United States Recruiting
Show 8 more locations
-
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada Recruiting -
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Canada Recruiting -
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, Canada Recruiting -
Copenhagen University Hospital
Hvidovre, Denmark Recruiting -
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark Recruiting -
St. Antoine
Paris, France Recruiting -
Emek Medical Center
Afula, Israel Recruiting -
Cleveland Clinic London
London, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Geraldine Kelly
- Email: geraldine.kelly@medtronic.com
- Phone: +353014393000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Predicting rebleeding risk in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding
This study is trying to create a better way to predict which patients who have had serious stomach bleeding are at risk of bleeding again, so doctors can provide better care and prevention.
-
Endovascular treatment outcomes after portal hypertension–related GI bleeding in cirrhosis
This study tests how well endovascular procedures for portal hypertension–related GI bleeding work in adults with cirrhosis, and what factors predict outcomes.
-
Tegoprazan to prevent GI complications in ischemic stroke patients on antiplatelet therapy
This trial tests whether tegoprazan can lower gastrointestinal complications in adults with ischemic stroke or TIA who are starting antiplatelet therapy.
-
Routine use of Potassium Competitive Acid Blocker vs guideline GI protection in AMI with PCI
This trial tests whether giving a potassium competitive acid blocker regularly after AMI with PCI and DAPT helps more than following standard GI protection guidelines.
-
Managing gastrointestinal bleeding in people taking direct oral anticoagulants
This project will see how doctors treat gastrointestinal bleeding in adults on direct oral anticoagulants and whether giving prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) appears helpful and safe.
-
Wireless optical capsule to detect upper gastrointestinal bleeding
This trial will test a swallowed wireless optical capsule (HemoPill) to see if it can detect bleeding in adults with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.