Compare three bowel-cleansing methods before colonoscopy: 4-L PEG with bisacodyl and docusate, 2-L PEG with simethicone, and 2-L PEG alone.
Official title: Comparative Study Between Using a 4-L Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol and Bisacodyl + Docusate Sodium Regimen Versus a 2-L Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol Plus Oral Simethicone Regimen Versus Conventional Method for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
Run by Tanta University · NCT07328880 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares three bowel-cleansing methods to see which is safest, easiest to tolerate, and cleans best for adults preparing for a colonoscopy.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 450 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tanta University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tanta, Gharbyea) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | April 26, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07328880 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–70 scheduled for an outpatient colonoscopy who can give written informed consent are the ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with renal failure, cirrhosis or ascites, congestive heart failure, bleeding disorders, seizure disorder, gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, pregnancy or lactation, or known allergy to the preparations are excluded and would not benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial at Tanta University Hospitals enrolls adults aged 18–70 undergoing outpatient colonoscopy and assigns them to one of three bowel-preparation regimens: 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol with bisacodyl and docusate sodium, 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol plus oral simethicone, or 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol alone. Participants will have history-taking, clinical examination, laboratory tests, and a colonoscopy performed 24 hours after starting the preparation. Bowel cleanliness will be rated using the Aronchick bowel preparation scale, and investigators will record adverse events and patient compliance. The trial directly compares safety, tolerability, and cleansing effectiveness across the three regimens.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the best regimen could provide better bowel cleanliness with fewer side effects, making colonoscopies quicker and more accurate.
How similar studies have gone: Similar reduced-volume PEG regimens with adjuncts such as bisacodyl or simethicone have shown mixed but generally promising results for improving tolerability and bowel cleanliness in prior trials.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing colonoscopy as a day-care procedure for various indications (lower GI bleeding, colorectal cancer screening, altered bowel habits, etc.) * Patients of either sex aged \>18 years and \<70 years. * Patients willing to give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of Renal failure, cirrhosis, ascites, CCF, bleeding disorders, seizure disorder, gastrointestinal obstruction, or perforation. * History of serious adverse events to other electrolyte-based colonic lavages. * Female patients who are pregnant or lactating or considering pregnancy. * Allergy.
Where it's running
-
Tanta University Hospitals
Tanta, Gharbyea, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Rania M Elkafoury, MD
- Email: rania.elkafoury@med.tanta.edu.eg
- Phone: +201004672358
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Oral N-Acetylcysteine for Diabetic Macular Edema
This study tests whether taking N-acetylcysteine by mouth can help people with center-involving diabetic macular edema who don’t yet need anti-VEGF therapy.
-
3D-Printed versus Conventional Palatal Cribs for Tongue Thrust in Children
This study tests whether a 3D-printed cobalt-chromium palatal crib works better than a traditional soldered stainless steel crib to help kids stop tongue thrusting.
-
Dia-Root Bio MTA vs MTA Plus forIndirect Pulp Capping in Young Permanent Molars
This trial tests whether Dia-Root Bio MTA works as an indirect pulp cap in kids’ first permanent molars better or similar to standard MTA Plus.
-
Nanohydroxyapatite vs Fluoride Varnish for MIH Front Teeth
This trial tests whether a nanohydroxyapatite varnish can remineralize MIH-affected front teeth in 8–11 year-olds as effectively as a standard 5% fluoride varnish.
-
Lactium premedication to see if it prevents emergence agitation after adenotonsillectomy
A preoperative dose of Lactium is tested to see if it prevents emergence agitation in children after adenotonsillectomy.
-
Tri-lobar HoLEP vs En-bloc HoLEP: learning curves in men with enlarged prostates
This study tests whether the tri-lobar or en-bloc HoLEP technique is easier to learn for surgeons new to HoLEP in men with BPH and prostate sizes 80–150 cc.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.