Community-centered programs to prevent youth and young adult violence
Official title: Estimating the Impact of Alternative Crisis Response Models on Community Violence
Run by NYU Langone Health · NCT07494019 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will try to see if programs like co-responder teams, alternative response, and community violence interventions reduce violent injuries among youth and young adults in U.S. cities and counties.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 15 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | NYU Langone Health Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (New York, New York) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 30, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 29, 2028 |
| Study ends | September 29, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | March 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07494019 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are U.S. cities or counties that implemented a single, clearly defined community-centered safety program with documented launch date, scope, and at least 24 months of pre-implementation and 12 months of post-implementation outcome data.
✕Probably not a fit
Jurisdictions with unclear program boundaries, overlapping or multiple concurrent interventions, unstable reporting practices, or insufficient outcome data are unlikely to provide useful evidence or directly benefit from this analysis.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational project will describe how community-centered safety models (co-response, alternative response, and community violence intervention programs) are implemented across U.S. municipalities using implementation-science methods. It will estimate impacts on fatal and nonfatal violent injury and some justice-related outcomes using quasi-experimental approaches, including pooled augmented synthetic control designs. The team will also explore operational and contextual factors tied to stronger or weaker program effects to understand when and where these models work best.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could identify which community-centered approaches most reduce violent injuries among youth and young adults and guide policymakers on where to scale or refine programs.
How similar studies have gone: Local and program-level evaluations of similar co-response and community violence interventions have shown promising but mixed results, and a pooled quasi-experimental national analysis is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria for Jurisdiction/Sites: 1. Intervention modality clarity: A single, identifiable CCSM-Co-Response (CRM), Alternative Response (ARM), or Community Violence Intervention (CVI)-implemented at city/county level. 2. Documented launch date \& scope: Public or official documentation specifying program start date, catchment, operating hours, staffing, eligibility, and core activities. 3. Observation window: ≥24 months pre-implementation and ≥12 months post-implementation of outcome data (monthly preferred; annual acceptable for fatal outcomes). 4. Outcomes coverage: Availability of primary outcomes (fatal and nonfatal violent injury) and at least one secondary justice outcome at the jurisdiction level. 5. Data quality: Stable geographic boundaries, consistent reporting practices, and no catastrophic breaks that preclude credible counterfactual fit. 6. Donor comparability: Jurisdiction characteristics and data cadence compatible with a pooled augmented synthetic control design (i.e., can be matched to a synthetic control and included in permutation tests). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pilot-only or indeterminate programs: Short-lived pilots, ambiguous or multi-modality rollouts where treatment timing or content cannot be reliably defined. 2. Severe data discontinuity: Major boundary changes, reporting suspensions, coding overhauls, or dataset gaps that undermine time-series integrity (e.g., prolonged outages during system migration) and cannot be addressed with standard remedies. 3. Overlapping major interventions: Concurrent, poorly measured citywide initiatives (e.g., sweeping policy bundles) that coincide with the CCSM start and make identification infeasible. 4. Insufficient pre-period: \<24 months pre-implementation data for primary outcomes. 5. Incompatible cadence/aggregation: Outcomes only available at spatial or temporal units that cannot be aligned with other sites or donors.
Where it's running
-
NYU Langone Health
New York, New York, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Bennett Allen, PhD — NYU Langone Health
- Study coordinator: Bennett Allen, PhD
- Email: Bennett.Allen@nyulangone.org
- Phone: 646- 501-3708
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Medial unloader brace after root repair
This study tests whether using a medial unloader brace after arthroscopic medial meniscus posterior root repair helps healing and improves knee outcomes.
-
MAC-STILA: a feasibility test for hip fracture surgery anesthesia
This trial tests whether combining monitored anesthesia care with soft tissue infiltration using local anesthesia can reduce post-operative delirium in adults 65 and older undergoing hip fracture repair.
-
Osimertinib with Cyclosporine A for EGFR-mutant NSCLC
This phase II study tests whether adding cyclosporine A to osimertinib helps people with EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC who still have detectable tumor DNA in blood.
-
Histotripsy with chemotherapy and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer
This pilot test will see if adding histotripsy to chemoimmunotherapy is safe and feasible for adults with biliary tract cancer.
-
A look at why Lewy body conditions cause visual hallucinations
This study tests brain‑imaging in people with Lewy body diseases who do or don’t experience visual hallucinations, and in healthy volunteers, to see how brain networks might create these images.
-
Virtual Reality Vision Testing for Metamorphopsia and Aniseikonia
A portable virtual reality headset is tested to see if it can more reliably and conveniently measure visual distortions in people with metamorphopsia or aniseikonia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.