Combining thoracic spine and shoulder joint mobilization for frozen shoulder
Official title: Additional Effects of Thoracic Spine Mobilization Combined With Glenohumeral Joint Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07328295 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will see if adding thoracic spine mobilization to shoulder (glenohumeral) mobilization helps people aged 40–65 with adhesive capsulitis reduce pain, improve shoulder motion, and regain function.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 34 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 15, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | January 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | January 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07328295 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 40–65 years old with unilateral or bilateral adhesive capsulitis (stage II or III), at least 3–4 months of shoulder pain, and measurable loss of shoulder ROM are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
People with shoulder pain caused by systemic inflammatory disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), recent shoulder fracture/trauma, thoracic outlet syndrome, cervical radiculopathy, spinal myelopathy, infection, or tumors are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a university physical therapy center in Islamabad that compares combined thoracic spine plus glenohumeral joint mobilization versus glenohumeral mobilization alone for adhesive capsulitis. Participants aged 40–65 with stage II or III frozen shoulder and at least 3–4 months of symptoms will be enrolled and randomized to one of the two intervention groups. Outcomes include shoulder pain, range of motion, and functional disability measured over the study period using standardized clinical measures. The protocol applies manual central and unilateral posterior-anterior thoracic mobilizations alongside directed glenohumeral glides to test whether addressing regional interdependence yields superior clinical benefits.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could provide greater pain relief, increased shoulder range of motion, and better day-to-day function than glenohumeral mobilization alone.
How similar studies have gone: Biomechanical studies and some clinical reports suggest thoracic mobilization can improve shoulder mechanics, but randomized trials specifically combining thoracic and glenohumeral mobilization for adhesive capsulitis remain limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * • Both male and female patients with a primary complaint of unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain * Pain has persisted for at least 3 to 4 months * Decreased shoulder ROM observed, including external shoulder rotation, abduction, internal rotation, and flexion * Age range between 40 to 65 years * Diagnosed with stage 2nd or 3rd of the disease. Exclusion Criteria: * • Patients if they had any shoulder pain resulting from systematic disease such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (morning stiffness \> 1 hour, multiple small joints pain/swelling) Infection, Tumors, and conditions like myelopathy (Hoffman's sign). * Recent shoulder joint fracture/ trauma. * Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (Roos test). * The presence of Cervical radiculopathy (Spurling's test)
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Laiba Malik, DPT
- Email: mlaiba085@gmail.com
- Phone: +3495049904
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.