Coil embolization for unilateral vs bilateral chronic subdural hematomas
Official title: Assessing Outcomes of Coil Embolization for Unilateral vs Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Run by Lahey Clinic · NCT07715656 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether unilateral or bilateral coil-based embolization of the middle meningeal artery helps people with chronic subdural hematoma.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 400 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Lahey Clinic Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Burlington, Massachusetts) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 9, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 20, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07715656 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older with chronic subdural hematoma and mass effect, eligible for embolization, with pre-randomization mRS ≤ 3.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with unstable hematomas, higher baseline disability, or those outside the eligibility criteria may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized trial enrolling up to 400 adults with chronic subdural hematoma. Participants are randomized to receive either unilateral or bilateral coil embolization of the middle meningeal artery, and followed for 1 to 3 months to assess hematoma size and functional outcomes. The study uses intention-to-treat analysis to compare effectiveness between the two approaches. Eligibility includes adults with mass effect from cSDH, stable hematoma prior to randomization, and varying subgroups based on medical versus surgical management. The trial aims to clarify whether unilateral or bilateral embolization provides better clinical benefit with acceptable safety.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred embolization approach could improve hematoma resolution and functional recovery for patients with cSDH.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies in embolization for cSDH show promise, but this trial directly compares unilateral versus bilateral coil embolization in a randomized, multicenter setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria: 1. Subject is 18 years of age or older. 2. Subject has a diagnosis of chronic subdural hematoma with mass effect Determined by brain imaging (CT or MRI) and correlated clinical symptoms. 3. Pre-randomization modified Rankin Score (mRS) ≤3 a. Surgical Cohort: Assessment should reflect the subject's condition just prior to undergoing surgery. Assessment may be performed post-surgery using pre-surgical data. 4. Subdural Hematoma Size Medical Management Cohort: * Midline shift \< 10mm and hematoma thickness \> 10 mm as measured on coronal imaging perpendicular to the skull. * No focal deficit related to the chronic subdural hematoma requiring surgical intervention Surgical Cohort: • No requirement 5. A CT performed prior to randomization demonstrating stability of the hematoma. Stability is defined as no worsening of midline shift or increase in the size of the cSDH from the screening image that results in new or worsening clinical symptoms. 6. Patient or designated Legal Authorized Representative, confirms the patient has the mental capacity, willingness and ability to comply with protocol and follow-up requirements 7. In the opinion of the treating physician, MMA embolization is technically feasible, including evaluation of preoperative CTA, if available, or presence of a foramen spinosum bilaterally. Exclusion Criteria: * Candidates will be excluded from participation if ANY of the following apply: 1. Patients presenting with an acute SDH (e.g. patient with presenting with a SDH due to trauma); mixed density is permitted. 2. Subject presents with bilateral cSDHs requiring treatment (contralateral cSDH \<5mm and not requiring treatment is permitted. 3. Subject presents with Glasgow Coma Scale \< 9 4. Markwalder assessment \>4 5. cSDH that developed with underlying conditions such as vascular lesions, brain tumor, arachnoid cyst, spontaneous intracranial hypotension, end stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis, end stage liver disease or other comorbidities causing a coagulopathy 6. Prior carotid stent placement that crosses the origin of the External Carotid Artery (ECA) ipsilateral to the subdural hematoma 7. Presumed septic embolus, or suspicion of microbial superinfection 8. CT or MRI evidence of intra-cranial tumor or mass lesion 9. Significant contraindication to angiography (eg. kidney failure). 10. Life expectancy of less than 1-year 11. Women who are pregnant, lactating, plan on becoming pregnant during the course of the clinical investigation. We routinely do pregnancy tests prior to this procedure, to avoid radiation exposure to the fetus including radiation on follow up CT scans 12. Current involvement in an investigational (drug, device, etc.) clinical trial that may confound study endpoints. Subjects in observational, natural history, and/or epidemiological studies not involving intervention are eligible 13. Patient unwilling to follow SOC recommendations (e.g. refuses surgery or lifestyle modifications)
Where it's running
-
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jonathan Pace, MD — Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Sandy L Alvarez, MD
- Email: sandy.l.alvarez@lahey.org
- Phone: 7865800186
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation to Prevent Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma
This study tests whether embolising the middle meningeal artery around the time of hematoma evacuation can reduce recurrence in adults with chronic subdural hematoma.
-
What causes vulnerability in older adults with serious diseases and how it affects care decisions
This study tests how often vulnerability factors appear in older adults with serious illnesses and how these factors influence treatment timing, survival, and quality of life.
-
Non-Thermal Plasma Used During Surgery to Help Prevent Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma
A randomized trial tests whether applying non-thermal plasma during standard surgery to drain a chronic subdural hematoma can reduce recurrence within 6 months.
-
Enhanced recovery pathway for burr-hole drainage in chronic subdural hematoma patients
This project tests whether an enhanced recovery protocol for adults having burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma can reduce recurrence and complications compared with past patients.
-
Matched microcatheter and guidewire use for middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma
This will test whether using a matched Aristotle 14 guidewire and Plato 17 microcatheter during middle meningeal artery embolization works better than surgeons' usual device choices for adults with chronic subdural hematoma.
-
Tranexamic acid plus surgery versus surgery alone for adults with chronic subdural hematoma
This trial will see if adding tranexamic acid to standard burr-hole surgery lowers the chance an adult's chronic subdural hematoma comes back.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.