Cervicothoracic Mobilization for Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Official title: Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization on Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion, and Disability in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07921017 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A randomized trial tests whether adding cervicothoracic joint mobilization to standard physical therapy helps reduce shoulder pain and improve motion in adults with supraspinatus tendinitis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 25 Years to 45 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 62 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 29, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 2, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 6, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07921017 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 25–45 with a clinical diagnosis of supraspinatus tendinitis confirmed by Jobe’s test and related signs.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals with prior shoulder surgery, non-supraspinatus shoulder pathology, osteoporosis, spinal fractures, tumors, or AC joint arthritis may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial will enroll 62 adults with supraspinatus tendinitis, assigning 31 to receive cervicothoracic mobilization in addition to conventional physiotherapy and 31 to receive conventional physiotherapy alone. The experimental treatment uses Maitland’s Grade III-IV central PA and transverse oscillatory techniques targeting the cervicothoracic junction (C6-T4). Outcomes include pain with a numeric rating scale, shoulder range of motion, and disability via the SPADI, measured at baseline and after the intervention. Data will be analyzed with independent t-tests using SPSS to determine if the addition of cervicothoracic mobilization yields greater improvements than conventional therapy alone.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience greater reductions in shoulder pain and better function through improved cervicothoracic mobility.
How similar studies have gone: Evidence for cervicothoracic mobilization in supraspinatus tendinitis is limited, making this trial relatively novel in this specific population.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female patients both are included age ranging from 25 to 45 years. * Diagnosis confirmed through Jobe's Test (Empty can) and characteristic signs and symptoms of supraspinatus tendinitis. Exclusion Criteria: * History of any previous surgical intervention involving the shoulder. * Shoulder joint instability due to causes other than supraspinatus pathology. * Presence of acromioclavicular joint arthritis. * Participants were excluded if they had osteoporosis, spinal fractures, or tumors.
Where it's running
-
Itefaq Hospital and PMC by Dr. Waqar Ali
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Ali Raza, Mphill — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, Phd
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Telerehabilitation vs. supervised rehabilitation for patellofemoral pain syndrome
This study tests whether remote exercise therapy can work as well as in-person supervised rehab for people with patellofemoral pain.
-
Vestibular Stimulation vs Core Stability Training for Sitting Balance in Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether vestibular stimulation or core stability training helps improve sitting balance in young children with hypotonic cerebral palsy.
-
Hybrid mobile health and telerehabilitation vs in-person physiotherapy for shoulder pain
This study tests whether a mobile-health program, tele-rehabilitation sessions, or conventional physiotherapy can help adults with Subacromial Pain Syndrome.
-
Telerehabilitation vs clinic-based physiotherapy for children with spastic cerebral palsy
This study tests whether structured telerehabilitation can be as effective as in-clinic physiotherapy for improving movement in children aged 4–12 with spastic cerebral palsy.
-
tDCS plus Action Observation Therapy for leg function in children with diplegic CP
This study tests whether adding active brain stimulation to action observation therapy can improve leg movement in kids with diplegic cerebral palsy better than a sham stimulation with the same therapy.
-
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
This study tests whether Sensory Integration Therapy helps improve gross motor function more than standard physical therapy in children aged 4–10 with mixed cerebral palsy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.