Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 60

Cannulated screws versus K-wires for fixing distal radius (wrist) fractures

Official title: A Comparative Study Between Cannulated Screws and K-wires in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Run by Sohag University · NCT07523386 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study will test whether cannulated screws or K-wires lead to better arm function and fewer complications in adults (18–60) with displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures.

More Distal Radius Fractures trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Enrollment34 (estimated)
SponsorSohag University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Sohag, Naser City)
StatusRecruiting
StartedApril 22, 2026
Main results expectedJanuary 22, 2027
Study endsJanuary 23, 2027
Registry record updatedApril 20, 2026
Trial IDNCT07523386 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18–60 with displaced or unstable extra‑articular distal radius fractures who are fit for surgery and willing to follow up are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients with open fractures, pathological fractures, prior wrist fractures or surgery, associated neurovascular injury, polytrauma, or severe osteoporosis/systemic conditions affecting bone healing are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this comparison.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a prospective, two-group comparative study that assigns adults with displaced extra‑articular distal radius fractures to fixation with either cannulated screws or K-wires. Participants will undergo the assigned minimally invasive fixation and be followed for 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome is wrist function measured by the DASH score at 6 months, with secondary outcomes including radiographic alignment (radial height, inclination, volar tilt), time to union, and complication rates. The goal is to directly compare clinical and radiological recovery between the two commonly used fixation methods.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could identify which fixation method gives better wrist function and fewer complications, helping surgeons choose the preferred technique for selected fractures.

How similar studies have gone: Prior small studies and case series have reported comparable outcomes for minimally invasive cannulated screw fixation and K-wires in selected extra‑articular fractures, but robust comparative data are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients aged between 18\_60years.
* Patients with displaced or unstable Distal Radius Fractures requiring surgical Fixation.
* Type A Extra articular Fractures.
* Patients fit for surgery and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* open distal Radius Fractures.
* Pathological Fractures.
* Previous Fractures or surgeries affecting the wrist.
* Associated neurovascular injury.
* polytrauma patient.
* Patients with severe osteoporotic or systemic condition affecting bone healing.

Where it's running

  • Sohag university hospital
    Sohag, Naser City, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.