Bubble PEP plus Segmental Breathing versus Incentive Spirometry for children with pleural effusion
Official title: Effect of Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure and Segmental Breathing Versus Incentive Spirometry on Lung Expansion and Dyspnea in Children With Pleural Effusion
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07248774 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether bubble positive expiratory pressure with segmental breathing helps children aged 5–16 with pleural effusion breathe better than incentive spirometry.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 5 Years to 16 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 28, 2025 |
| Main results expected | January 5, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | November 25, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07248774 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are children aged 5–16 with pleural effusion or hydrothorax who have had a thoracic drainage system in place for at least 24 hours and no other coexisting illnesses.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with other pulmonary pathologies, chest trauma, pneumothorax, hemothorax, chylothorax, significant chest pain, musculoskeletal chest deformities, or comorbid causes of effusion are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a randomized clinical trial enrolling 40 pediatric patients aged 5–16 at hospitals in Lahore who have pleural effusion. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either Bubble PEP with segmental breathing or incentive spirometry, with both groups also receiving conventional chest physiotherapy and mobility. Outcomes measured before and after the intervention include lung expansion on chest X-ray, dyspnea using the Pediatric Dyspnea Scale, chest expansion by tape measure, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and respiratory rate. The study tests whether the low-cost Bubble PEP approach can be an effective alternative to mechanical incentive spirometers in this population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could offer a low-cost, effective way to improve lung expansion and breathing in children with pleural effusion.
How similar studies have gone: PEP techniques and incentive spirometry have shown benefits for airway clearance and lung expansion in other populations, but direct comparisons in pediatric pleural effusion are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 5 to 16. * Suffering from Pleural effusion or hydrothorax. * Thoracic drainage system in situ for 24 hours. * Either gender will be included. * Patients without any other co-existing illness. Exclusion Criteria: * Any other pulmonary pathology that does not fit the diagnostic criteria of Pleural Effusion. * Participants with unbearable chest pain, chylothorax, hemothorax, pneumothorax, chest trauma or rib fracture. * Participants with other comorbidities leading to pleural effusion. * Patients who have chest musculoskeletal deformities.
Where it's running
-
The Children Hospital and University of Child Health Sciences
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Tayyba Bari, MS-PT — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: IMRAN AMJAD, PhD
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 9233224390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Feasibility of a disposable flexible bronchoscope for thoracoscopy compared with a semi-rigid pleuroscope in pleural effusion
This study tests whether a single-use flexible bronchoscope can be used safely and effectively for medical thoracoscopy in patients with pleural effusion, compared with the standard semi-rigid pleuroscope.
-
Once-daily intrapleural enzyme treatment for complicated pleural infections
This will see if giving tPA and DNase once a day through a chest tube works as well as giving them twice a day for people with complicated pleural infections.
-
Pleural fluid biomarker testing to help diagnose lung adenocarcinoma
This project will test whether measuring new molecular markers in pleural fluid can help diagnose lung adenocarcinoma in adults who need thoracentesis.
-
Air introduction during pleural effusion drainage for trapped lung
This study is testing if adding air during the drainage of fluid from the chest can help adults with a trapped lung feel less pain and have a better experience compared to the usual method.
-
16F vs 24F chest drain after minimally invasive lobectomy or segmentectomy
This study will test whether using a smaller 16F chest drain causes less postoperative pain than the standard 24F drain for adults having minimally invasive lobectomy or segmentectomy for lung cancer.
-
Local anesthesia thoracoscopy for diagnosing pleural effusion
This study tests if using local anesthesia during a thoracoscopy can help diagnose suspected cancer-related fluid buildup in the chest faster and more comfortably than standard tests.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.