Biofeedback versus vaginal palpation to teach voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions
Official title: Biofeedback Versus Vaginal Palpation to Teach a Voluntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction to Women Incapable of Performing it? A Non-inferiority Randomized Controled Trial
Run by University of Sao Paulo · NCT05194137 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares biofeedback and vaginal palpation to see which better helps women with urinary incontinence who cannot currently contract their pelvic floor muscles learn a correct contraction.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Sao Paulo Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2022 |
| Main results expected | July 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 22, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT05194137 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women aged 18 or older with urinary incontinence who cannot perform a correct pelvic floor contraction (Modified Oxford Scale 0–2) and who can attend in-person sessions at the Universidade de São Paulo (Ribeirão Preto) are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Women with pelvic neuropathy, active vaginal or urinary infection, advanced pelvic organ prolapse preventing evaluation (Baden-Walker stage >2), pregnant women, or those with significant cognitive impairment are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a randomized, parallel two-arm trial comparing a proprioception training protocol delivered with biofeedback versus the same protocol delivered with vaginal palpation. Women who cannot perform a correct pelvic floor muscle contraction (Modified Oxford Scale grade 0–2) receive structured training with sessions at baseline and follow-ups at 3, 6, and 9 weeks, with contraction/rest timing standardized. The primary outcome is the proportion of women achieving a correct voluntary contraction (grade 3 or better). The trial is conducted at the Universidade de São Paulo site in Ribeirão Preto and uses an intention-to-treat comparison between the two teaching methods.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, more women who currently cannot contract their pelvic floor may learn a correct contraction, which could reduce urinary incontinence symptoms and improve quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: Biofeedback has shown benefit in some pelvic floor training studies, but direct comparative evidence versus vaginal palpation specifically for teaching an initial voluntary contraction is limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Women aged 18 or over; * Women referred to the physiotherapeutic treatment of the Lucy Montoro Rehabilitation Center (Ribeirão Preto Medical School) or the Women's Health Reference Center (MATER) for any pelvic floor dysfunction; * Women unable to perform a PFM contraction (i.e. PFM function classified as 0 or 1 according to the modified oxford scale); * Women with urinary incontinence (i.e ICIQ-UI-SF score ≥ 3) * Agree to participate in the research by signing the informed consent form It will not be included in this study: * Women whose pelvic floor dysfunction has an associated neuropathy; * Women with vaginal or urological symptoms of possible infections; * Women with pelvic organs prolapse that makes it impossible to evaluate or conduct treatment (stage \> 2 according to Baden-Walker Scale); * Pregnant women; * Women with cognitive impairment. Exclusion Criteria: * Women who become pregnant while conducting the study * Women with intolerance or pain that prevents the conduct of research protocols.
Where it's running
-
Universidade de São Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Urinary incontinence in older adults: how leakage and bladder residuals relate to frailty
This study tests whether the severity of urinary leakage and leftover urine after voiding are linked to frailty and other geriatric outcomes in older adults visiting a urology clinic.
-
Compare two pelvic floor stimulation devices to see which helps with urinary incontinence in women
We’re testing if electromagnetic chair therapy can help women with mixed urinary incontinence as well as standard electrostimulation with biofeedback.
-
Educational video before urodynamic testing to see if it lowers anxiety
This study tests whether watching a short educational video before urodynamics helps reduce anxiety for women undergoing the test.
-
Improving Uroflowmetry: Do Pre-Procedure Reminders Help Women Undergoing Urodynamics
This study tests whether sending reminder calls before a urodynamics test helps women with pelvic floor disorders feel more prepared and less anxious, and whether it makes the procedure go more smoothly.
-
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Improve Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
This study tests whether adding telehealth sex therapy to pelvic floor physical therapy helps men recover sexual function after prostate cancer treatment.
-
Multimodal approach to reduce urinary incontinence in young female athletes
A multimodal program combining pelvic health education and core stability training is tested to see if it reduces urinary incontinence in young nulliparous female athletes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.