Assessing the effectiveness of low volume transanal irrigation for patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
Official title: A Randomised Clinical Investigation to Assess Efficacy of Low Volume Transanal Irrigation by Qufora® IrriSedo MiniGo Versus Conservative Treatment for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Patients
Run by Qufora A/S · NCT06923150 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing if a new low-volume irrigation method can help adults with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome feel better after rectal cancer surgery compared to standard treatment alone.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 78 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Qufora A/S Industry-sponsored |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 9 sites (Amiens and 8 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 18, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 11, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06923150 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older who have undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer and have a LARS score of 25 or higher.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who have contraindications to transanal irrigation or have previously used this method after colorectal surgery may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical investigation aims to evaluate the efficacy of low volume transanal irrigation using the Qufora® IrriSedo MiniGo device in patients suffering from Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) following rectal cancer surgery. The study compares the outcomes of this irrigation method combined with conservative treatment against conservative treatment alone over a period of three months. Eligible participants include adults who have undergone elective surgery for rectal cancer and have experienced LARS symptoms for at least one month. The study will assess clinical symptoms and quality of life improvements in these patients.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could significantly improve the management of LARS symptoms and enhance the quality of life for affected patients.
How similar studies have gone: While this approach is relatively novel, similar studies assessing transanal irrigation for LARS have shown promising results in improving patient outcomes.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult aged from 18 years 2. Patients electively treated for rectal cancer with a low anterior resection 3. Between 3 and 18 months after the conservative colorectal surgery or 3 and 18 months after the stoma reversal if applicable 4. LARS score \>= 25 (minor or major LARS) (Emmertsen and Laurberg 2012) AND LARS definition as consensus with at least one symptom that results in at least one consequence (Keane et al. 2020) 5. Adult for whom previous conservative treatments were started for at least a month 6. Mental and physical capability of the patient to handle the MiniGo by himself. 7. Check of the anastomosis (no signs of leakage or clinical relevant stenosis) and absence of local recurrence by Rectal digital examination of the anastomosis, any other exam used in the current practice 8. Patient affiliated to the health social security system Exclusion Criteria: 1. Contra-indication to use TAI 2. Former use of TAI (post colo-rectal surgery) 3. Clinically relevant stenosis 4. Current metastatic disease or local recurrence 5. Ongoing chemotherapy 6. Postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer 7. History of diarrhoeal disease 8. Inflammatory bowel disease 9. Dementia 10. Spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease or other significant disease assessed to be a contributory cause to LARS symptoms. 11. Patient with cancer recurrence 12. Patient with a life expectancy \< 1 year 13. Participating to another clinical trial for the treatment of LARS symptom 14. Ongoing pelvic floor rehabilitation/biofeedback 15. Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the trial period 16. Inability and unwillingness to give informed consent
Where it's running
-
CHU Amiens-Picardie
Amiens, France Recruiting -
CHU Besançon
Besançon, France Recruiting -
Clinique Tivoli-Ducos
Bordeaux, France Recruiting -
CHU Grenoble
La Tronche, France Recruiting -
CHU de NANTES, Hôtel Dieu
Nantes, France Recruiting -
CHU Charles Nicolle - Rouen
Rouen, France Recruiting
Show 3 more locations
-
CHU Timone
Marseille, France Not yet recruiting -
CHU Bordeaux, GH Sud, Hôpital HAUT-LEVEQUE
Pessac, France Not yet recruiting -
CH Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, France Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Rogini Balachandran
- Email: rob@qufora.com
- Phone: + 45 42 40 06 20
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Intensified follow-up to reduce bowel symptoms and improve life after rectal cancer surgery
We will test whether an intensified follow-up program can reduce LARS symptoms and improve quality of life for people who have had rectal cancer surgery with a protective ileostomy.
-
Personalized care pathways for bowel symptoms after rectal cancer treatment
This project will test whether using an electronic bowel diary and quality-of-life questionnaires can identify treatable causes of ongoing bowel problems in people treated for rectal cancer.
-
Development of an e-diary for bowel symptoms in rectal cancer patients
This study is trying to create an easy-to-use online diary for rectal cancer patients to track their bowel symptoms after treatment and see how it affects their daily lives.
-
Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
-
DEM301 in advanced colorectal cancer: a first-in-human test
This first-in-human Phase 1 study tests DEM301 in adults with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer to see if it is safe, how it behaves in the body, and whether it shows any signs of activity.
-
Rectal cancer registry to track real-world treatments and outcomes
This registry collects real-world data on how locally advanced rectal cancer is treated in Austria, to see how TNT and dMMR/MSI-H cases are managed and what outcomes occur.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.