3D comparison of maxillary expansion methods in children

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Effects of Different Maxillary Expansion Methods

Not applicable Interventional Bezmialem Vakif University · NCT07262892

This project tests whether the Invisalign Palatal Expander or traditional rapid maxillary expansion better widens the upper jaw in children with maxillary transverse deficiency.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment60 (estimated)
Ages6 Years to 12 Years
SexAll
SponsorBezmialem Vakif University Academic / other
Locations1 site (Istanbul, Fatih)
Trial IDNCT07262892 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This controlled prospective trial will enroll 60 children aged 6–12 and allocate 20 each to an Invisalign Palatal Expander (IPE) group, an acrylic cap-splint rapid maxillary expansion (RME) group, and an untreated control group. Three-dimensional intraoral and extraoral scans will be taken at the end of expansion, and at three and six months to create digital models. Primary measures include maxillary arch width, first molar angulation, palatal surface area, and palatal volume, while secondary outcomes assess facial soft tissue changes. Group comparisons will use standard statistical tests to directly contrast a traditional mechanical expander with a modern digitally produced removable device.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are cooperative children aged 6–12 with maxillary transverse deficiency, good oral hygiene, and no previous maxillary expansion.

Not a fit: Children with craniofacial syndromes, systemic conditions affecting bone growth, prior maxillary expansion, or older patients with fused palatal sutures are unlikely to benefit from these interventions.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose the expansion method that achieves better arch widening with fewer side effects and simpler hygiene for children.

How similar studies have performed: Traditional RME has an established evidence base for skeletal widening, while IPE is a newer digital approach and direct pediatric head-to-head comparisons are scarce.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Children aged 6-12 years
* Good oral hygiene and adequate patient cooperation
* No previous orthodontic expansion treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

* Systemic diseases affecting growth, bone metabolism, or craniofacial development
* Craniofacial syndromes or congenital anomalies
* Severe behavioral or cooperation problems
* Previous orthodontic or orthopedic maxillary expansion
* Patients undergoing medications that affect bone metabolism

Where this trial is running

Istanbul, Fatih

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Maxillary Transverse DeficiencyMaxillary ExpansionRapid Maxillary ExpansionInvisalign Palatal ExpanderTransverse Maxillary DeficiencyThree-Dimensional EvaluationOrthodonticsPediatric Dentistry
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.