NIH-funded research R01 grant

Surgery versus inside-the-vessel methods to create dialysis arteriovenous fistulas

Official title: Comparing surgical and endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation

Funded at University of California Los Angeles · NIH-10913412 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project compares traditional surgical versus newer endovascular ways of creating arteriovenous fistulas for people who need hemodialysis.

More Arteriovenous Fistula research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeR01 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionUniversity of California Los Angeles
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Los Angeles, United States)
Project startSeptember 25, 2022
Project endAugust 31, 2026
Funding year2025
Award (this year)$306,342
NIH project number5R01DK132422-03
Project IDNIH-10913412 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Adults with end-stage kidney disease who need a new arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis and who meet the anatomic criteria for surgical or endovascular AVF creation would be the ideal candidates.

Less likely to help

People who do not need dialysis access, who are not candidates for either surgical or endovascular fistula creation, or whose blood vessel anatomy makes endovascular devices unsuitable may not benefit from this work.

What this research studies

If you need a new arteriovenous fistula (the blood vessel connection used for hemodialysis), this research will look at outcomes after the usual surgical operation versus newer devices that create the fistula from inside the blood vessels. The team will collect procedural and short-term outcome data on patients treated with either approach to learn which patients do better with each method. They will also document how often patients meet the anatomic requirements for the endovascular devices, since not everyone is eligible for those methods. The goal is to use these results to plan a larger trial that would directly guide patient and clinician choices about fistula creation.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: Results could help patients and doctors choose the approach that leads to better initial success, fewer additional procedures, and fewer complications when creating dialysis access.

How similar studies have gone: Early industry-sponsored trials and small studies showed the endovascular devices can work and they are FDA-approved, but no large prospective head-to-head comparisons with surgical AVF have been done.

Where this research is happening

  • University of California Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Woo, Karen — University of California Los Angeles
  • Study coordinator: Woo, Karen

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.