NIH-funded research NIH-funded research

Service-user mental health quality tool

Official title: Ensuring Quality in Psychological and Mental Health Services - Service User Quality Assessment EQUIP-SU

Funded at George Washington University · NIH-11180386 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project will co-create a short checklist that people who use mental health services in low- and middle‑income countries can use to rate and report the quality of the care they receive.

More Mental Health research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeNIH-funded research
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionGeorge Washington University
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Washington, United States)
Project startSeptember 2, 2024
Project endJuly 31, 2027
Funding year2025
Award (this year)$430,040
NIH project number4RF1MH137346-02
Project IDNIH-11180386 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Ideal candidates are people with lived experience of mental health conditions who currently use or recently used primary‑care or community mental health services in low‑ or middle‑income countries.

Less likely to help

People who do not use mental health services or who only receive highly specialized inpatient psychiatric care in high‑resource settings are unlikely to directly benefit from this project.

What this research studies

You and other people who use mental health services will help design a simple tool alongside caregivers, health managers, and policy makers. The tool will ask about concrete items like provider communication, privacy of clinical spaces, availability of medications, referrals for psychological care, and patient education materials. Patients will complete the tool in primary care and community settings where non‑specialists deliver mental health services, and the team will pilot and refine it based on user feedback. Collected ratings will be shared with local managers and policy makers to guide service improvements.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this could give patients a clear, patient‑created way to identify problems and push for better communication, privacy, medication access, and referrals in local mental health services.

How similar studies have gone: Patient‑reported experience measures and co‑creation approaches have shown promise in improving services, but applying a standardized, user‑created quality tool for non‑specialist mental health care in low‑resource settings is relatively new.

Where this research is happening

  • George Washington University
    Washington, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Kohrt, Brandon Alan — George Washington University
  • Study coordinator: Kohrt, Brandon Alan

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.