NIH-funded research NIH-funded research

Monthly penicillin injections versus daily oral penicillin to prevent early rheumatic heart disease from getting worse

Official title: Intramuscular vs. Enteral Penicillin Prophylaxis to Prevent Progression of Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease: A non-inferiority randomized trial. (GOALIE)

Funded at Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr · NIH-11467140 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial compares daily oral penicillin to monthly penicillin shots for children with early, hidden rheumatic heart disease.

More Heart Disease research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeNIH-funded research
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionCincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Cincinnati, United States)
Project startFebruary 1, 2023
Project endJanuary 31, 2028
Funding year2026
Award (this year)$135,660
NIH project number3R33HL166441-04S3
Project IDNIH-11467140 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Children identified by screening echocardiography as having latent (early) rheumatic heart disease are the ideal candidates for this trial.

Less likely to help

Children with advanced rheumatic heart disease or those with a penicillin allergy would not be expected to benefit from this prevention comparison.

What this research studies

If an echocardiogram shows a child has latent (early) rheumatic heart disease, this randomized trial will assign children to receive either monthly intramuscular penicillin injections or daily oral penicillin. Participants will be followed over time to see whether the heart condition progresses, and researchers will track side effects, missed school or work, and how well families stick to the medication plan. The study uses a non-inferiority design, meaning oral penicillin must be shown not to be meaningfully worse than injections for preventing progression. If oral treatment is similar, it could offer a less painful, easier option for long-term prevention in low-resource settings.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If oral penicillin is not meaningfully worse than injections, patients could have a simpler, less painful option that makes long-term prevention easier and more accessible.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work (including the GOAL trial) showed intramuscular penicillin reduced progression compared with no treatment, but direct head-to-head comparisons with daily oral penicillin are limited, so this question remains relatively new.

Where this research is happening

  • Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr
    Cincinnati, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Beaton, Andrea Zawacki — Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr
  • Study coordinator: Beaton, Andrea Zawacki

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.