Improving how doctors use a tool to predict the risk of pulmonary embolism.

Nudging Provider Adoption of Clinical Decision Support: Implementation of an EHR-Agnostic Pulmonary Embolism Risk Prediction Tool

NIH-funded research New York University School of Medicine · NIH-11051198

This study is looking at ways to help doctors in emergency rooms use a special tool that predicts the risk of blood clots in the lungs, so they can make better decisions about whether to do CT scans, which can sometimes be unnecessary and expose patients to extra radiation.

Quick facts

Grant typeR01 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionNew York University School of Medicine NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (New York, United States)
Project IDNIH-11051198 on NIH RePORTER

What this research studies

This research aims to enhance the adoption of a clinical decision support tool designed to predict the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) before conducting CT scans in emergency departments. By integrating behavioral economics principles, the project seeks to create 'nudges' that encourage healthcare providers to use evidence-based guidelines more effectively, thereby reducing unnecessary CT scans and associated risks. The study will evaluate how these nudges can improve provider behavior and decision-making in real clinical settings. Ultimately, the goal is to minimize unnecessary radiation exposure and improve patient safety.

Who could benefit from this research

Good fit: Ideal candidates for this research are patients who are being evaluated for pulmonary embolism in emergency departments.

Not a fit: Patients who are not being assessed for pulmonary embolism or those who do not require CT scans will not benefit from this research.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this research could significantly reduce unnecessary CT scans for pulmonary embolism, lowering radiation exposure and associated health risks for patients.

How similar studies have performed: Previous research has shown that integrating behavioral insights into clinical decision-making tools can improve provider adherence to guidelines, suggesting a promising avenue for this approach.

Where this research is happening

New York, United States

Researchers

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page below.
Last reviewed 2026-06-10 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.