NIH-funded research R37 grant

Improving accuracy of HIV research that uses medical records

Official title: Statistical methods and designs for correlated outcome and covariate errors in studies of HIV/AIDS

Funded at Vanderbilt University Medical Center · NIH-11469944 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This work creates ways to combine routine electronic health records with smaller, carefully checked samples to give more accurate results for people living with HIV.

More AIDS research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeR37 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionVanderbilt University Medical Center
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Nashville, United States)
Project startJanuary 25, 2018
Project endJanuary 31, 2028
Funding year2026
Award (this year)$30,654
NIH project number3R37AI131771-09S4
Project IDNIH-11469944 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

People living with HIV whose clinic or hospital records are part of participating electronic health record systems or international HIV databases (for example, sites contributing to IeDEA) are the records that could be included.

Less likely to help

Patients who do not have electronic health records at participating clinics, who receive care outside the contributing databases, or who want direct clinical treatment rather than research participation may not see direct benefit.

What this research studies

Electronic health records and routinely collected clinic data often contain mistakes that can skew HIV research. This project will pair the large but error-prone record sets with smaller groups of records checked against gold-standard measurements, then use new statistical methods and multi-step designs to correct biases and tighten estimates. The team will build software tools and apply these approaches to international HIV clinic data (for example, IeDEA) so findings reflect real patient outcomes more reliably. By targeting which records to validate and how to combine data, the approach aims to make conclusions from existing HIV data sources more trustworthy.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this could make many HIV research findings—such as rates of complications or treatment effects—more accurate, supporting better clinical and policy decisions.

How similar studies have gone: Earlier work by this group and others has shown that combining validated subsamples with routine data can improve accuracy, and this project expands and optimizes those methods for HIV datasets.

Where this research is happening

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Shepherd, Bryan Earl — Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Study coordinator: Shepherd, Bryan Earl

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.