NIH-funded research R01 grant

Fairer quality scores for depression and anxiety care

Official title: Identifying and addressing bias in depression and anxiety quality measures

Funded at Kaiser Foundation Research Institute · NIH-11362602 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project checks whether depression and anxiety care ratings work fairly for different patients, especially Black patients, and aims to fix unfair scoring rules.

More Depression research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeR01 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionKaiser Foundation Research Institute
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Oakland, UNITED STATES)
Project startAugust 7, 2024
Project endApril 30, 2027
Funding year2026
Award (this year)$1,028,635
NIH project number5R01MH137060-03
Project IDNIH-11362602 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

People with depression or anxiety who have completed self-reported outcome questionnaires during care, especially those treated in health systems that report HEDIS or MIPS measures, would be most relevant.

Less likely to help

People without mood or anxiety conditions, those who do not complete outcome surveys, or those receiving care outside systems that report these quality measures are unlikely to be directly affected.

What this research studies

Researchers will use patient-reported outcome scores and medical records to see how current quality ratings are calculated and who they help or hurt. They will test specific problems such as mixing very different patients into one measure, preferring remission over proportional improvement, using long outcome windows, and treating missing scores as failures. The team will compare results across populations, including people of Black race and those with complex treatment histories. They will propose clearer scoring rules and alternative measures intended to avoid penalizing clinics that serve disadvantaged patients.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this work could make quality ratings and payment programs fairer so clinics serving disadvantaged patients are not unfairly penalized.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research has shown that some quality measures can be biased and that alternative metrics can reduce disparities, but applying such fixes within national reporting and payment programs is still relatively new.

Where this research is happening

  • Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
    Oakland, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Shortreed, Susan M — Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
  • Study coordinator: Shortreed, Susan M

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.