Comparing two surgical methods for treating uterovaginal prolapse in women
Patient-Centered Outcomes of Sacrocolpopexy versus Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
This study is looking at two different types of surgery for treating uterovaginal prolapse to see which one helps patients recover faster and feel better overall, so if you're considering surgery for this condition, your experience could help guide future choices!
Quick facts
| Grant type | R01 grant |
|---|---|
| Study type | NIH-funded research |
| Funding institution | Case Western Reserve University NIH-funded |
| Lab location | 1 site (Cleveland, United States) |
| Project ID | NIH-10912638 on NIH RePORTER |
What this research studies
This research investigates the effectiveness of two surgical approaches for treating uterovaginal prolapse (UVP): vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension and minimally invasive hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy. The study aims to gather high-quality data on patient-centered outcomes, such as recovery time, return to normal activities, and overall quality of life after surgery. By focusing on these outcomes, the research seeks to provide valuable insights that can help patients and surgeons make informed decisions about the best treatment options. Participants will be monitored for surgical failure rates and other important factors over a three-year period.
Who could benefit from this research
Good fit: Ideal candidates for this research are women diagnosed with uterovaginal prolapse who are considering surgical treatment options.
Not a fit: Patients who are not candidates for surgery or those with other complicating health conditions may not benefit from this research.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this research could lead to improved surgical decision-making and better outcomes for women undergoing surgery for uterovaginal prolapse.
How similar studies have performed: Previous research has shown that patient-centered outcomes can significantly influence surgical success, suggesting that this approach may yield valuable insights.
Where this research is happening
Cleveland, United States
- Case Western Reserve University — Cleveland, United States (Active)
Researchers
- Principal investigator: Hijaz, Adonis K — Case Western Reserve University
- Study coordinator: Hijaz, Adonis K
About this research
- This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
- Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
- For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page below.