NIH-funded research U01 cooperative agreement

Comparing endoscopic treatment and shunts for hydrocephalus in babies

Official title: Endoscopic versus Shunt Treatment of Hydrocephalus in Infants

Funded at Utah State Higher Education System--University of Utah · NIH-11400235 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project compares an endoscopic procedure called ETV+CPC with standard CSF shunt surgery to find out whether babies under 1 year have similar thinking and development one year after treatment.

More Hydrocephalus research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeU01 cooperative agreement
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionUtah State Higher Education System--University of Utah
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Salt Lake City, United States)
Project startSeptember 15, 2019
Project endAugust 31, 2027
Funding year2025
Award (this year)$22,440
NIH project number3U01NS107486-06S3
Project IDNIH-11400235 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Infants aged 12 months or younger (corrected age) with hydrocephalus who need surgical treatment at a participating tertiary pediatric neurosurgery center are the ideal candidates.

Less likely to help

Older children, adults, or infants whose type of hydrocephalus makes ETV+CPC unsuitable would not be eligible or likely to benefit directly from this project.

What this research studies

If your baby needs surgery for hydrocephalus, doctors at participating pediatric neurosurgery centers will treat infants with either an endoscopic procedure (ETV+CPC) or a traditional cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Babies will be followed for 12 months after surgery and their thinking and development will be measured using the Bayley-III Cognitive Scale with a preset non-inferiority margin. The work is done through the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network at tertiary centers across North America and focuses on infants ≤12 months corrected age. The main aim is to determine whether choosing the endoscopic option can avoid lifelong shunt dependence without harming early cognitive development.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If ETV+CPC produces similar cognitive outcomes, families might be able to avoid lifelong shunt complications, lowering long-term risks, costs, and quality-of-life burdens.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work from the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network and others shows ETV+CPC is a safe and viable shunt-free option for many infants, but direct comparisons focused on cognitive outcomes are limited.

Where this research is happening

  • Utah State Higher Education System--University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Kestle, John — Utah State Higher Education System--University of Utah
  • Study coordinator: Kestle, John

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.