NIH-funded research R01 grant

Comparing bladder-sparing therapies and surgery for recurrent bladder cancer

Official title: BEST CARE for Recurrent NMIBC: BladdEr-Sparing Therapy and Cystectomy As TREatments

Funded at University of Washington · NIH-10856797 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is looking at different treatment options for people with recurring non-muscle invasive bladder cancer to help them and their doctors make better choices about whether to try bladder-sparing therapies or go for surgery, all with the goal of improving their health and quality of life.

Quick facts

Grant typeR01 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionUniversity of Washington
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Seattle, United States)
Project startJuly 1, 2024
Project endJune 30, 2029
Funding year2024
Award (this year)$1,039,794
NIH project number1R01CA289268-01
Project IDNIH-10856797 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Ideal candidates for this research are individuals diagnosed with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who are facing treatment decisions.

Less likely to help

Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer or those who have already undergone radical cystectomy may not benefit from this research.

What this research studies

This research investigates treatment options for patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), focusing on bladder-sparing therapies versus radical cystectomy. It aims to gather high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions, as current options are often made with limited information. The study will utilize a unique patient cohort to assess outcomes and help patients, caregivers, and clinicians make informed choices about their care. By addressing the complexities of treatment decision-making, the research seeks to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this research could provide clearer guidance on the best treatment options for patients with recurrent NMIBC, potentially improving survival rates and quality of life.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research has shown promise in improving treatment decision-making for bladder cancer, but this specific approach is novel and aims to fill significant evidence gaps.

Where this research is happening

  • University of Washington
    Seattle, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Gore, John L. — University of Washington
  • Study coordinator: Gore, John L.

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.