Comparing AC joint reconstruction methods to restore shoulder mechanics and tissue health

Multicenter, longitudinal study of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction techniques for restoring shoulder complex biomechanics and soft tissue health

NIH-funded research University of Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston · NIH-11178347

This project compares simpler versus more complete AC joint repairs to find which helps people with high-grade shoulder injuries regain normal shoulder movement and healthier soft tissues.

Quick facts

Grant typeR01 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionUniversity of Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Houston, United States)
Project IDNIH-11178347 on NIH RePORTER

What this research studies

Researchers at multiple hospitals will follow people who receive surgery for high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries over several years to track shoulder function and tissue health. They will compare repairs that rebuild only the vertical stabilizers (coracoclavicular ligaments) with repairs that also reconstruct the AC capsule and ligaments for horizontal stability. Participants will have clinical exams, imaging, and movement/biomechanics testing during follow-up visits to see how the shoulder performs over time. If you have a severe AC joint injury and get surgery at a participating center, you might be invited to join this long-term follow-up.

Who could benefit from this research

Good fit: Ideal candidates are people, often young athletes, with high-grade AC joint injuries who are planning or recently had surgical reconstruction.

Not a fit: People with low-grade AC injuries managed without surgery or those with different shoulder conditions are unlikely to gain direct benefit from this research.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the work could point surgeons to the technique that best restores shoulder stability and reduces long-term tissue damage and dysfunction.

How similar studies have performed: Previous studies suggest non-rigid, anatomy-preserving repairs often do better than rigid fixation, but combining coracoclavicular and AC-capsule reconstruction is relatively new and not yet proven.

Where this research is happening

Houston, United States

Researchers

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page below.
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.