NIH-funded research NIH-funded research

Catheter removal of lung blood clots for submassive pulmonary embolism

Official title: 2/2 Pulmonary Embolism: Thrombus Removal with Catheter-Directed Therapy (PE-TRACT Trial) –DCC

Funded at New York University School of Medicine · NIH-11167691 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This compares catheter-directed clot removal with lower-dose clot-busting medicine to usual care for people who have submassive pulmonary embolism with right-heart strain but normal blood pressure.

More Pulmonary Embolism research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeNIH-funded research
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionNew York University School of Medicine
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (New York, United States)
Project startSeptember 1, 2022
Project endAugust 31, 2028
Funding year2025
Award (this year)$570,142
NIH project number5U24HL155811-04
Project IDNIH-11167691 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Adults with submassive pulmonary embolism who have evidence of right-heart dysfunction but maintain normal blood pressure and are eligible for catheter-directed therapy are the intended candidates.

Less likely to help

People with massive PE (low blood pressure), those at high risk of bleeding, or those who cannot undergo catheter procedures are unlikely to benefit from this intervention.

What this research studies

If you join, you would be randomly assigned to get catheter-directed therapy that delivers a low dose of clot-busting medicine directly into the lung arteries or to receive usual care without that catheter procedure. The trial is open-label (you and your care team will know which treatment you get) but the people who judge outcomes are blinded. Up to 500 people will be enrolled, and the study can stop early if the catheter approach clearly helps or clearly does not help. Doctors will measure exercise capacity at 3 months and heart-failure symptoms at 12 months to see if the catheter approach improves recovery.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could improve short-term exercise capacity and long-term heart–lung symptoms without substantially increasing major bleeding.

How similar studies have gone: Smaller trials and observational studies suggest catheter-directed therapy can reduce clot burden and may lower bleeding compared with full-dose systemic thrombolysis, but long-term patient-centered benefits remain uncertain.

Where this research is happening

  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Troxel, Andrea B — New York University School of Medicine
  • Study coordinator: Troxel, Andrea B

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.