NIH-funded research R21 grant

Best length of daratumumab maintenance for light-chain (AL) amyloidosis

Official title: Evaluating Maintenance In Light chain Amyloidosis (EMILIA)

Funded at Mayo Clinic Rochester · NIH-11247977 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This project compares shorter (6 months) versus longer (18 months) daratumumab maintenance for people with AL amyloidosis who have responded to daratumumab-CyBorD induction.

More Amyloidosis research and trials

Quick facts

Grant typeR21 grant
Study typeNIH-funded research
Funding institutionMayo Clinic Rochester
NIH-funded
Lab location1 site (Rochester, United States)
Project startDecember 13, 2024
Project endNovember 30, 2026
Funding year2026
Award (this year)$188,695
NIH project number5R21CA288898-02
Project IDNIH-11247977 on NIH RePORTER

Who could benefit from this research

Could help

Adults with AL (light-chain) amyloidosis who achieved an adequate hematologic response after daratumumab-CyBorD induction would be the ideal candidates.

Less likely to help

Patients who have not received daratumumab-CyBorD induction, who did not achieve a good hematologic response, or those with other non-AL forms of amyloidosis would not be expected to benefit from or be eligible for this trial.

What this research studies

If you have light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and achieved a good blood response after initial daratumumab-CyBorD therapy, this trial would randomly assign you to receive daratumumab maintenance for either 6 months or 18 months. Doctors will monitor blood markers, organ function, and side effects over time to see how long the response lasts and whether organs recover. The study uses a pragmatic design to reflect real-world care while comparing the two maintenance lengths. The goal is to find whether shorter maintenance can keep benefits while lowering treatment burden or whether longer maintenance gives better outcomes.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this could show the optimal maintenance duration to preserve responses and organ recovery while potentially reducing treatment time and side effects.

How similar studies have gone: The phase III ANDROMEDA trial showed daratumumab-CyBorD induction improves hematologic responses but included non-randomized maintenance, so randomized evidence on optimal maintenance duration is currently lacking.

Where this research is happening

  • Mayo Clinic Rochester
    Rochester, United States
    Active

Researchers

  • Principal investigator: Kourelis, Taxiarchis — Mayo Clinic Rochester
  • Study coordinator: Kourelis, Taxiarchis

Related research

Other NIH-funded projects on the same topics.

About this research

  1. This is an active NIH-funded research project — typically early-stage science, not a clinical trial accepting patient enrollment.
  2. Some NIH-funded labs run parallel clinical studies or seek volunteers for related work. To check, contact the principal investigator or institution listed above.
  3. For full project details, budget, and progress reports, visit the official NIH RePORTER page.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.